"We can escape the commonplace only by manipulating it, controlling it, thrusting it into our dreams or surrendering it to the free play of our subjectivity"
About this Quote
Escaping the everyday, Vaneigem argues, is not a matter of finding some pristine “outside” to ordinary life but of seizing the ordinary as raw material and remaking it. The line pivots on a sly contradiction: the route out of the commonplace runs straight through it. That’s classic Situationist strategy, and Vaneigem, writing in the wake of postwar consumer capitalism, treats the banal not as neutral background but as an engineered environment. “The commonplace” is what the spectacle manufactures: habits, desires, even boredom, all prepackaged and sold back to you as normality.
The verbs do the real ideological work. “Manipulating,” “controlling,” “thrusting,” “surrendering” sketch two seemingly opposite tactics that are secretly allied. On one side: deliberate intervention, a kind of DIY authorship of experience. On the other: yielding to “free play,” an embrace of subjectivity that refuses productivity’s leash. Both are forms of reclamation. Vaneigem’s subtext is that passivity is not innocence; it’s collaboration. If you don’t shape the everyday, it shapes you.
“Dreams” lands like a provocation, not a retreat. He’s not recommending escapist fantasy so much as insisting that imagination is a political faculty: the capacity to perceive alternatives inside what’s been declared inevitable. The intent, then, is insurgent: to turn daily life into a site of contest where art, desire, and refusal can interrupt routine. In the 1960s ferment that fed May ’68, this was a call to stop waiting for revolution to arrive in parliament or the factory and start staging it in the texture of lived experience.
The verbs do the real ideological work. “Manipulating,” “controlling,” “thrusting,” “surrendering” sketch two seemingly opposite tactics that are secretly allied. On one side: deliberate intervention, a kind of DIY authorship of experience. On the other: yielding to “free play,” an embrace of subjectivity that refuses productivity’s leash. Both are forms of reclamation. Vaneigem’s subtext is that passivity is not innocence; it’s collaboration. If you don’t shape the everyday, it shapes you.
“Dreams” lands like a provocation, not a retreat. He’s not recommending escapist fantasy so much as insisting that imagination is a political faculty: the capacity to perceive alternatives inside what’s been declared inevitable. The intent, then, is insurgent: to turn daily life into a site of contest where art, desire, and refusal can interrupt routine. In the 1960s ferment that fed May ’68, this was a call to stop waiting for revolution to arrive in parliament or the factory and start staging it in the texture of lived experience.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Raoul
Add to List
