"We have points in common with the FDP, particularly when it comes to tax"
About this Quote
Otto Schily points to a pragmatic overlap in a policy area that often signals ideological identity. The FDP, Germany's classical liberal party, has long championed lower taxes, a leaner state, and incentives for investment. By noting common ground on taxes, Schily acknowledges the SPD's centrist turn under Gerhard Schroeder, when social democrats embraced market-friendly reforms while maintaining a commitment to social protections.
The early 2000s provide the clearest backdrop. Schroeder’s government cut the top income tax rate and reduced corporate taxes, arguing that competitiveness and growth required a lighter fiscal burden and a simpler tax code. Finance Minister Hans Eichel pursued consolidation alongside tax reform, and the Agenda 2010 program linked labor market flexibility with pro-business signals. Many of these moves aligned with FDP priorities, even if justified in social-democratic terms: efficiency to safeguard the welfare state, not just shrink it.
Such convergence has a strategic dimension within Germany’s coalition politics. By highlighting agreement on taxation, Schily gestures toward possible alliances beyond the traditional SPD-Green axis, notably the so-called traffic light coalition with the FDP that was periodically floated before finally materializing years later. Emphasizing compatibility on taxes reassures centrist voters and economic actors that an SPD-led government would not revert to purely distributive politics at the expense of growth.
The remark also clarifies where boundaries still lie. The SPD continues to defend progressive taxation and social investment, while the FDP resists expansive redistribution and prefers broader bases with lower rates. They may diverge on the scale of the state, on civil liberties, or on regulatory questions, areas where Schily himself courted controversy as a security-focused interior minister. Yet on the mechanics of tax reform — simplification, competitiveness, incentives for work and enterprise — there is enough overlap to make negotiation plausible.
By framing tax policy as a shared language, Schily situates the SPD within a broader European Third Way moment, where social democrats sought to balance equity with market realities, and to build coalitions on common ground rather than on maximal ideological contrast.
The early 2000s provide the clearest backdrop. Schroeder’s government cut the top income tax rate and reduced corporate taxes, arguing that competitiveness and growth required a lighter fiscal burden and a simpler tax code. Finance Minister Hans Eichel pursued consolidation alongside tax reform, and the Agenda 2010 program linked labor market flexibility with pro-business signals. Many of these moves aligned with FDP priorities, even if justified in social-democratic terms: efficiency to safeguard the welfare state, not just shrink it.
Such convergence has a strategic dimension within Germany’s coalition politics. By highlighting agreement on taxation, Schily gestures toward possible alliances beyond the traditional SPD-Green axis, notably the so-called traffic light coalition with the FDP that was periodically floated before finally materializing years later. Emphasizing compatibility on taxes reassures centrist voters and economic actors that an SPD-led government would not revert to purely distributive politics at the expense of growth.
The remark also clarifies where boundaries still lie. The SPD continues to defend progressive taxation and social investment, while the FDP resists expansive redistribution and prefers broader bases with lower rates. They may diverge on the scale of the state, on civil liberties, or on regulatory questions, areas where Schily himself courted controversy as a security-focused interior minister. Yet on the mechanics of tax reform — simplification, competitiveness, incentives for work and enterprise — there is enough overlap to make negotiation plausible.
By framing tax policy as a shared language, Schily situates the SPD within a broader European Third Way moment, where social democrats sought to balance equity with market realities, and to build coalitions on common ground rather than on maximal ideological contrast.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Otto
Add to List
