"We should like to have some towering geniuses, to reveal us to ourselves in color and fire, but of course they would have to fit into the pattern of our society and be able to take orders from sound administrative types"
About this Quote
Priestley’s barb lands because it flatters our stated hunger for greatness while exposing the bureaucratic leash we quietly insist it wear. “Towering geniuses” arrives in a gust of romantic longing: the artist as lightning rod, the figure who can “reveal us to ourselves in color and fire.” Then the sentence executes its turn - “but of course” - that deadly English phrase that smuggles obedience in under the guise of common sense. The punchline is administrative: genius, yes, so long as it can “fit into the pattern” and “take orders” from the “sound” types who know how to manage budgets, reputations, and risk.
The intent is not simply to praise artists and sneer at managers; it’s to indict a culture that wants the prestige of originality without the inconvenience of disruption. Priestley is diagnosing a national habit of committee-thinking: we applaud visionaries in retrospect, but in real time we domesticate them, insisting their fire be safely contained in approved channels. The phrase “sound administrative types” drips with irony - “sound” as in sensible, steady, respectable - also as in dull, deadening, designed to mute precisely the intensity we claim to crave.
Context matters: Priestley wrote through the rise of mass bureaucracy, broadcasting, wartime planning, and postwar managerial consensus in Britain. The modern state and modern corporations both learned to sponsor culture as long as culture behaved. His line anticipates today’s version: institutions demanding “innovation” that must still clear compliance, branding, and HR. It’s a warning about how societies turn genius into a job title, then wonder why the work stops burning.
The intent is not simply to praise artists and sneer at managers; it’s to indict a culture that wants the prestige of originality without the inconvenience of disruption. Priestley is diagnosing a national habit of committee-thinking: we applaud visionaries in retrospect, but in real time we domesticate them, insisting their fire be safely contained in approved channels. The phrase “sound administrative types” drips with irony - “sound” as in sensible, steady, respectable - also as in dull, deadening, designed to mute precisely the intensity we claim to crave.
Context matters: Priestley wrote through the rise of mass bureaucracy, broadcasting, wartime planning, and postwar managerial consensus in Britain. The modern state and modern corporations both learned to sponsor culture as long as culture behaved. His line anticipates today’s version: institutions demanding “innovation” that must still clear compliance, branding, and HR. It’s a warning about how societies turn genius into a job title, then wonder why the work stops burning.
Quote Details
| Topic | Management |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Priestley
Add to List








