"Well, I don't know if I can comment on Kant or Hegel because I'm no real philosopher in the sense of knowing what these people have said in any detail so let me not comment on that too much"

In this quote, Roger Penrose decently addresses his limitations when it pertains to discussing the philosophies of Immanuel Kant and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Penrose, understood primarily for his operate in mathematical physics and cosmology, makes a clear difference in between his knowledge in science and his self-professed absence of detailed understanding in the field of approach. This statement reflects a more comprehensive humbleness about the limits of one's own understanding and a regard for the depth of expertise associated with other disciplines.

The expression "I'm no real thinker" recommends Penrose's recommendation that philosophical query involves a level of in-depth engagement and specialization that he does not declare to have. This is despite his own intellectual achievements that frequently intersect with philosophical styles, especially in the context of understanding awareness and the structures of mathematics. When he says, "let me not discuss that too much", it acts as a cautionary note about the risk of violating the limits of one's understanding. Such an attitude is a sign of careful scholarly conduct, where respect for the complexity of another's field is critical.

Additionally, Penrose's choice of words reveals his gratitude for the seriousness of philosophical research study. Kant and Hegel are imposing figures in Western approach, known for their complex and comprehensive systems of idea. To "comment" on their work requires a large understanding of their theories, arguments, and historic contexts, which Penrose, here, claims not to possess in depth.

In essence, Penrose's statement is an example of intellectual humbleness, recognizing the significance of interdisciplinary regard. It underscores a broader academic concept: the worth of acknowledging and appreciating the borders of one's competence while appreciating the contributions of other disciplines. This humility does not diminish Penrose's own formidable accomplishments however rather enhances the collaborative spirit required for real interdisciplinary dialogue and progress.