"Kant and Hegel are interesting thinkers. But I am happy to insist that they are also terrible writers"

Alain de Botton's quote--"Kant and Hegel are interesting thinkers. However I more than happy to firmly insist that they are also terrible writers"-- records a typical belief about the works of these 2 distinguished German philosophers. At its core, the declaration highlights a dichotomy in between the value of their intellectual contributions and the accessibility of their prose.

Immanuel Kant and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel are imposing figures in Western approach, understood for their complicated ideas on metaphysics, principles, and the nature of truth. Kant's "Critique of Pure Reason" and Hegel's "Phenomenology of Spirit" are influential works that have profoundly influenced philosophical discourse. Their concepts challenge readers to rethink the nature of understanding, presence, and the progression of historical awareness. Thus, labeling them as "intriguing thinkers" acknowledges the significance and depth of their philosophical contributions.

Nevertheless, de Botton contrasts this with a review of their composing design, a belief shared by many who have learnt their thick and detailed texts. Kant's dry and methodical writing can be a barrier even for skilled thinkers; his insistence on precise, technical language typically leads to complicated sentences. Similarly, Hegel's dialectical method, with its abstract and often odd terms, can be bewildering and challenging. For this reason, to call them "dreadful writers" is to point out the formidable obstacle they posture to readers in terms of clearness and readability.

In essence, de Botton's quote invites reflection on the distinction between the complexity of concepts and the clarity of expression. While Kant and Hegel provide abundant, thought-provoking material, their esoteric writing designs can push away and irritate even the most dedicated of readers. This critique advises contemporary scholars and authors to strive for clarity and availability without compromising intellectual rigor. In doing so, the profound concepts of approach can be more commonly appreciated and understood.