"Well, it's taken a long time to get the Department of Homeland Security established. It's taken a long time for the Congress to decide how much it wanted to fund"

In this quote, Warren Rudman deals with the obstacles and extended procedure of establishing and funding the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS). His words reflect on the bureaucratic and political difficulties that frequently accompany considerable governmental changes, especially in action to complex and urgent requirements, like those triggered by national security concerns following the events of September 11, 2001.

The phrase "it's taken a long time to get the Department of Homeland Security developed" recommends that the inception of the DHS was a protracted undertaking, likely due to the intricacies involved in integrating many firms and changing the existing governmental structures. The establishment of such a department requires meticulous planning, inter-agency coordination, and legislative approval, all of which can be lengthy. Rudman's option of words stresses the drawn-out nature of this procedure, maybe suggesting a sense of seriousness or disappointment with the rate of governmental reaction.

The latter part of the quote, "it's taken a very long time for the Congress to decide just how much it wanted to money", highlights the ongoing debates and negotiations that usually happen in Congress concerning resource allocation. Financing decisions for a new department involve political considerations and prioritization of nationwide requirements, all of which need cautious consideration to stabilize security concerns with fiscal obligation. This part of Rudman's declaration highlights the intricacy of reaching consensus amongst lawmakers, each with their constituents' interests and differing perspectives on national security and budgetary allotment.

Overall, Rudman's quote encapsulates the complex interplay between urgency, administration, political settlement, and resource allotment in forming and funding a vital governmental body. It communicates a reasonable view of how significant modifications within government structures are typically sluggish, intentional procedures that show the broader characteristics of democratic compromise and decision-making.