"We've finally given liberals a war against fundamentalism, and they don't want to fight it. They would, except it would put them on the same side as the United States"

Ann Coulter, a conservative political analyst known for her intriguing and typically polarizing declarations, presents a critique aimed at liberals in this quote. The text seems to encapsulate the contentious political dynamics widespread in the United States, especially focusing on the relationships between liberal ideologies, American diplomacy, and the fight versus fundamentalism.

In this quote, Coulter suggests that liberals, who typically promote for progressive causes and, theoretically, the opposition of oppressive fundamentalist routines, face a paradox. They exist with an opportunity to support a cause lining up with their values-- opposing fundamentalism. Yet, she argues that they think twice or refuse to participate in this battle due to the fact that doing so would align them with the U.S. government's more comprehensive diplomacy objectives, which they often slam.

Coulter's declaration can be interpreted as a critique of what she perceives as hypocrisy or disparity among liberals. She suggests that, in spite of their embraced ideals, liberals resist aligning with the United States on particular international concerns due to a hesitation to be associated with the government's actions, especially under administrations they might oppose. This can reflect the more comprehensive suspicion or dispute many liberals have with U.S. diplomacy, typically seeing it as imperialistic or driven by interests contrary to human rights.

This quote also underscores the polarization and division in American politics, where ideological commitment can in some cases eclipse typical goals. By framing the fight versus fundamentalism as a universal great, Coulter suggests that liberals are failing to support a beneficial cause due to partisan politics.

Coulter's assertion invites reflection on the intricacies of international policy, the nuances in political positioning, and questions about the real priorities of ideological groups when faced with worldwide difficulties. In sum, the quote acts as a rhetorical tool to concern and challenge the motivations and actions of political challengers.