"When we talk about justice in America we're really talking about justice brought about by the people, not by judges who are tools of the establishment or prosecutors who are are equally tools of the establishment or the wardens or the police officers"

In this quote, William Kunstler, a prominent civil rights legal representative, critiques the conventional institutions of justice in America. His primary assertion is that real justice originates from the populace rather than from the recognized legal and judicial institutions, which he views as mechanisms of the facility. Kunstler's option of the word "tools" in explaining judges, district attorneys, wardens, and police officers implies that these individuals frequently work to preserve existing power structures instead of obstacle or reform them in favor of real justice.

Kunstler's statement serves as a review of the traditional justice system, recommending that it may not consistently serve the interests of fairness and equity. By identifying these legal actors as tools of the establishment, he posits that they may be more concerned with protecting the status quo and wielding power than with making sure that justice is relatively administered. This perspective aligns with a more comprehensive critique of systemic inequality, highlighting how specific demographics, especially marginalized or disenfranchised neighborhoods, may not get fair treatment within this traditional framework.

Additionally, Kunstler's focus on "justice produced by the individuals" underscores his belief in grassroots motions and public advocacy as powerful forces for modification. It suggests that genuine progress and fairer outcomes in societal justice can frequently be achieved through the efforts of normal people who activate to require and enact change. Historically, such public-driven justice has appeared in different civil liberties movements and community-led efforts that aim to deal with and correct injustices not properly remedied by institutional systems.

In essence, Kunstler challenges the audience to contemplate the distinction between institutional and real justice, promoting for a vision of justice rooted in the will and actions of the people, urging society to look beyond recognized structures for services to variations in justice.