"When we think of the major threats to our national security, the first to come to mind are nuclear proliferation, rogue states and global terrorism. But another kind of threat lurks beyond our shores, one from nature, not humans - an avian flu pandemic"
About this Quote
Obama’s move here is a quiet reordering of the national security imagination: take the audience’s familiar villains (nukes, “rogue states,” terrorism) and then pivot to a threat that can’t be deterred, sanctioned, or bombed. The sentence structure does the work of persuasion. It starts by naming the orthodox consensus of post-9/11 anxiety, then uses “But” as a hinge to expand the definition of danger without directly scolding anyone for thinking too narrowly.
The subtext is political as much as it is epidemiological. By framing avian flu as a security issue, Obama is making a case for investments that can otherwise sound like bureaucratic housekeeping: surveillance systems, stockpiles, hospital capacity, global coordination. “Lurks beyond our shores” also borrows the language of external enemies, a deliberate choice that makes a microscopic pathogen legible in the same emotional register as foreign threats. Yet he immediately undercuts the human-adversary script: “one from nature, not humans.” That contrast signals humility and a different kind of preparedness, implying that the state’s competence should be measured not only by its ability to punish enemies, but by its ability to absorb shocks.
Context matters: this is the era when “security” discourse was dominated by counterterrorism. Obama is trying to widen the aperture of responsibility, nudging listeners toward a more modern, systems-based view of risk. It’s also a subtle critique of reactive politics: the disasters that reshape lives most deeply are often the ones that don’t arrive with a flag or ideology, only a curve on a chart.
The subtext is political as much as it is epidemiological. By framing avian flu as a security issue, Obama is making a case for investments that can otherwise sound like bureaucratic housekeeping: surveillance systems, stockpiles, hospital capacity, global coordination. “Lurks beyond our shores” also borrows the language of external enemies, a deliberate choice that makes a microscopic pathogen legible in the same emotional register as foreign threats. Yet he immediately undercuts the human-adversary script: “one from nature, not humans.” That contrast signals humility and a different kind of preparedness, implying that the state’s competence should be measured not only by its ability to punish enemies, but by its ability to absorb shocks.
Context matters: this is the era when “security” discourse was dominated by counterterrorism. Obama is trying to widen the aperture of responsibility, nudging listeners toward a more modern, systems-based view of risk. It’s also a subtle critique of reactive politics: the disasters that reshape lives most deeply are often the ones that don’t arrive with a flag or ideology, only a curve on a chart.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|
More Quotes by Barack
Add to List




