"You cannot parcel out freedom in pieces because freedom is all or nothing"

Tertullian's declaration, "You can not parcel out liberty in pieces because freedom is all or nothing", catches an extensive understanding of the nature of freedom. This quote recommends that freedom is an indivisible and outright idea. To "parcel out" indicates dividing something into parts, which is antithetical to the essence of real liberty. Liberty, in Tertullian's view, can not exist in fragmented bits; it is either totally recognized or not at all.

At its core, the quote challenges attempts to enforce partial freedoms, typically seen in societal, political, or personal contexts. Politically, it rebukes systems that promise flexibility selectively, granting liberties in some areas while restricting them in others. Such a system can develop an exterior of flexibility while rejecting its complete expression. True freedom must permeate every aspect of human life-- speech, thought, motion, and option, among others.

On a personal level, the quote can be translated to reflect private autonomy and self-determination. It triggers reflection on whether one is dealing with real freedom or is constrained by self-imposed or external constraints. The concept here enhances the necessity for individual liberation and the nerve to live authentically.

Philosophically, the quote resonates with the notion of existential freedom, where people are totally free to make choices unconfined by determinism. It refutes a piecemeal technique to existential liberty, underscoring that a person need to accept full obligation for one's life to really be free.

The quote is also a call to action. It requires watchfulness and advocacy for thorough liberty, advising us that complacency can cause the erosion of liberties. It advises societies, federal governments, and people to devote to the conservation and expansion of freedom in its entirety.

In summary, Tertullian's assertion highlights freedom as a holistic and essential characteristic of human presence. It challenges us to turn down partial flexibility and pursue a condition where freedom is not segmented however fully incorporating, thus pressing the borders of how we view and practice freedom in our lives and societies.