"You're in a profession in which absolutely everybody is telling you their opinion, which is different. That's one of the reasons George Lucas never directed again"
About this Quote
Francis Ford Coppola speaks from the trenches of a collaborative art form that can feel like a permanent focus group. Film invites an army of stakeholders, each armed with a different note: producers, financiers, studio executives, agents, stars, department heads, test audiences, critics, and now fans online. The director stands at the crossroads of all those conflicting opinions, responsible for coherence when the voices point in opposite directions. Coppola’s point is not that collaboration is bad, but that the volume and variety of feedback can fragment a vision, wear down resolve, and make the job feel less like creating and more like arbitrating.
His reference to George Lucas carries a sting and a history. Lucas burst into the 1970s with THX 1138 and American Graffiti, endured meddling from studios, then seized independence with Star Wars. After the first film he did not direct the next two installments, preferring to control the universe he created while delegating the chair. For decades he poured energy into writing, producing, and building technological infrastructure at ILM, Skywalker Sound, and Pixar’s early lineage. The persona that emerged was a world-builder and innovator who managed systems rather than exposing himself to the daily crossfire of set politics and studio notes. Coppola and Lucas, allies since the American Zoetrope days, knew how hostile the note culture could be to an auteur’s continuity of thought.
Coppola’s phrasing is hyperbolic, but it dramatizes a truth: the sheer multiplicity of opinions can push a director either to become a tyrant, a consensus-seeker, or an exile. To survive, a filmmaker must filter without becoming deaf, adapt without dissolving. The paradox is stark. Film is too big to make alone and too fragile to make by committee. The craft lies in protecting the spine of the story amid the noise, drawing nourishment from collaboration while refusing to let the vision be nibbled to death by a thousand different suggestions.
His reference to George Lucas carries a sting and a history. Lucas burst into the 1970s with THX 1138 and American Graffiti, endured meddling from studios, then seized independence with Star Wars. After the first film he did not direct the next two installments, preferring to control the universe he created while delegating the chair. For decades he poured energy into writing, producing, and building technological infrastructure at ILM, Skywalker Sound, and Pixar’s early lineage. The persona that emerged was a world-builder and innovator who managed systems rather than exposing himself to the daily crossfire of set politics and studio notes. Coppola and Lucas, allies since the American Zoetrope days, knew how hostile the note culture could be to an auteur’s continuity of thought.
Coppola’s phrasing is hyperbolic, but it dramatizes a truth: the sheer multiplicity of opinions can push a director either to become a tyrant, a consensus-seeker, or an exile. To survive, a filmmaker must filter without becoming deaf, adapt without dissolving. The paradox is stark. Film is too big to make alone and too fragile to make by committee. The craft lies in protecting the spine of the story amid the noise, drawing nourishment from collaboration while refusing to let the vision be nibbled to death by a thousand different suggestions.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Francis
Add to List
