Book: The Closing of the American Mind

Overview
Allan Bloom published The Closing of the American Mind in 1987 as a critique of contemporary higher education and American culture. A classical scholar and long-time University of Chicago professor, he argued that universities had abandoned the pursuit of truth and the teaching of classic texts, producing students with diminished intellectual curiosity and moral seriousness. The book intertwines philosophical analysis, cultural commentary, and anecdotal observation to make a broad cultural case against relativism and the commodification of education.

Main arguments
Bloom contends that an ethos of "openness" and relativism has come to dominate campuses, but that this supposed openness often masks a shallow tolerance that discourages genuine inquiry. Rather than exposing students to contrasting, difficult ideas through sustained engagement with the great works, universities have treated knowledge as a menu of options to be chosen for personal or professional advantage. That shift, he says, produces graduates who are unsettled in their desires, unable to pursue a consistent conception of the good, and indifferent to the search for truth.

Critique of academic disciplines and pedagogy
The book criticizes the professionalization of the academy and the rise of social sciences and specialized scholarship at the expense of liberal education. Bloom argues that fragmentation and methodological skepticism prevent students from encountering the ethical and existential questions that classic philosophy and literature pose. He is particularly critical of pedagogies that prioritize identity politics, therapy, or market-driven training over close reading, debate, and the Socratic method that disciplines the mind and character.

Culture, music, and the shaping of desire
Bloom links changes in student sensibility to broader cultural transformations. Popular music, mass entertainment, and newer attitudes toward sexuality are described as forces that erode older capacities for reflection and reverence. He suggests that the uncritical acceptance of permissiveness and consumer culture has a corrosive effect on the inner life, making students less receptive to the formative experience of grappling with the great books. For Bloom, the health of the soul is connected to the seriousness with which a society cultivates its young.

Defense of the Western canon and classical education
At the heart of Bloom's argument lies a robust defense of the Western canon and the pedagogical value of sustained engagement with classical texts. He champions the Socratic ideal of questioning and the discipline of reading that allows students to confront enduring moral and metaphysical puzzles. Bloom advocates education that shapes character as much as intellect, believing that exposure to Plato, Shakespeare, Nietzsche, and others cultivates judgment, courage, and a sense of human limits absent from a purely utilitarian curriculum.

Reception and legacy
The book became an immediate bestseller and ignited fierce debate. Supporters applauded its call for seriousness and its challenge to cultural relativism; critics accused Bloom of elitism, cultural nostalgia, and an inadequate account of social injustice and exclusion. Feminist, multicultural, and progressive commentators challenged his dismissal of movements that sought to diversify curricula and democratize knowledge. Regardless of the controversy, the work compelled public conversation about the aims of higher education, the place of the canon, and the cultural forces shaping youth. Its influence endures in ongoing debates about curriculum, intellectual rigor, and whether universities should cultivate character as well as skills.

Cite this Page