"A lie does not consist in the indirect position of words, but in the desire and intention, by false speaking, to deceive and injure your neighbour"
About this Quote
Swift, ever the surgeon with a grin, refuses to let language take the fall for human malice. The line strips “lying” of its convenient technicalities - the “indirect position of words” that lets politicians, pamphleteers, and polite society hide behind euphemism, implication, and lawyerly syntax. He’s preempting the classic dodge: I didn’t say it exactly. The real crime, Swift insists, lives upstream of phrasing, in “desire and intention” - the moral core we’d rather not audit.
The subtext is a jab at a culture that treats speech like a game of angles. In early 18th-century Britain and Ireland, where partisan print wars churned daily and reputations could be ruined as easily as they could be manufactured, indirectness wasn’t innocent style; it was a technology of harm. Swift knew the power of the half-truth, the insinuation, the sanctimonious “I’m just asking questions.” By anchoring the definition of a lie in intent “to deceive and injure your neighbour,” he frames falsehood as social violence, not semantic error.
It’s also Swift quietly defending satire itself. His own work thrives on indirection, on saying one thing while meaning another; if lying were merely “indirect words,” satire would be guilty by design. Instead, he draws a hard line between rhetorical cunning used to expose hypocrisy and rhetorical cunning used to exploit it. The target isn’t ambiguity. It’s cruelty with plausible deniability.
The subtext is a jab at a culture that treats speech like a game of angles. In early 18th-century Britain and Ireland, where partisan print wars churned daily and reputations could be ruined as easily as they could be manufactured, indirectness wasn’t innocent style; it was a technology of harm. Swift knew the power of the half-truth, the insinuation, the sanctimonious “I’m just asking questions.” By anchoring the definition of a lie in intent “to deceive and injure your neighbour,” he frames falsehood as social violence, not semantic error.
It’s also Swift quietly defending satire itself. His own work thrives on indirection, on saying one thing while meaning another; if lying were merely “indirect words,” satire would be guilty by design. Instead, he draws a hard line between rhetorical cunning used to expose hypocrisy and rhetorical cunning used to exploit it. The target isn’t ambiguity. It’s cruelty with plausible deniability.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|
More Quotes by Jonathan
Add to List











