"But although all our knowledge begins with experience, it does not follow that it arises from experience"
About this Quote
Kant is drawing a bright, almost surgical line between what triggers the mind and what the mind contributes. Experience, he grants, is the spark: without sensations, there is no thinking to do. But he refuses the empiricist punchline that the mind is just a passive recorder of the world. The subtext is an audacious reversal of intellectual authority: the deep structure of knowledge is not imported from reality; it is, in key ways, installed by us.
The sentence works because it sounds like a concession and behaves like a coup. “Begins with” offers Locke and Hume a polite nod, then “it does not follow” yanks the rug out from under their assumption that origins equal ingredients. Kant is telling you that experience is raw material, not the blueprint. Space, time, causality, even the idea of an object persisting long enough to be known - these are not read off the world like labels on a shelf. They are the mind’s organizing rules, the grammar that makes any “data” legible in the first place.
Context matters: Kant is responding to Hume’s skepticism, especially the worry that causation is just habit dressed up as certainty. His move is both defensive and revolutionary. Defensive, because it rescues science and mathematics from dissolving into mere custom. Revolutionary, because it relocates certainty inside the subject’s cognitive framework. You don’t just learn from experience; you manufacture “experience” as a coherent arena where learning can happen. That’s the philosophical mic drop: the world we can know is already filtered through the conditions that make knowing possible.
The sentence works because it sounds like a concession and behaves like a coup. “Begins with” offers Locke and Hume a polite nod, then “it does not follow” yanks the rug out from under their assumption that origins equal ingredients. Kant is telling you that experience is raw material, not the blueprint. Space, time, causality, even the idea of an object persisting long enough to be known - these are not read off the world like labels on a shelf. They are the mind’s organizing rules, the grammar that makes any “data” legible in the first place.
Context matters: Kant is responding to Hume’s skepticism, especially the worry that causation is just habit dressed up as certainty. His move is both defensive and revolutionary. Defensive, because it rescues science and mathematics from dissolving into mere custom. Revolutionary, because it relocates certainty inside the subject’s cognitive framework. You don’t just learn from experience; you manufacture “experience” as a coherent arena where learning can happen. That’s the philosophical mic drop: the world we can know is already filtered through the conditions that make knowing possible.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (Kritik der reinen Vernunft), Preface; standard reference A51/B75 (1781/1787). |
More Quotes by Immanuel
Add to List











