"Cultural dominance of middle-class norms prevail in middle-class schools with a teacher teaching toward those standards and with students striving to maintain those standards"
About this Quote
James S. Coleman points to the quiet power of culture in schooling. What looks like neutral academic rigor is often a set of middle-class expectations about language, behavior, and ambition. Teachers, trained and evaluated within that framework, aim their instruction toward those standards. Students, sensing what wins praise and advancement, learn to display the same habits. The result is a self-reinforcing loop: the norms of the dominant group define success, and success then seems to validate those norms.
Coleman came to this view through work that emphasized how peer groups, families, and communities shape educational outcomes as much as, or more than, material resources. The Equality of Educational Opportunity study found that the social environment and its shared expectations strongly affect achievement. Middle-class schools tend to be dense with social capital supporting academic behaviors: punctuality, deference to authority, comfort with abstract language, long-term planning, and extracurricular engagement. When those traits are built into grading rubrics, classroom discourse, and the hidden curriculum, students who already possess them enjoy a cultural match. Others can succeed, but often must first translate themselves into the prevailing code.
The observation is not an indictment of standards per se. Common norms can coordinate learning and protect time for instruction. The problem arises when one class’s cultural toolkit is treated as universal, while other ways of knowing and communicating are marked as deficits. That framing can produce tracking, disproportionate discipline, and the quiet exclusion of talents that do not fit the template.
Implications follow for policy and practice. Broadening definitions of excellence, diversifying curricular examples and discourse styles, and building bridges to the cultural resources students bring from home can maintain academic expectations without enforcing a single cultural mold. Coleman’s insight remains a reminder that schools teach more than content; they also teach which cultural signals count, and to whom they belong.
Coleman came to this view through work that emphasized how peer groups, families, and communities shape educational outcomes as much as, or more than, material resources. The Equality of Educational Opportunity study found that the social environment and its shared expectations strongly affect achievement. Middle-class schools tend to be dense with social capital supporting academic behaviors: punctuality, deference to authority, comfort with abstract language, long-term planning, and extracurricular engagement. When those traits are built into grading rubrics, classroom discourse, and the hidden curriculum, students who already possess them enjoy a cultural match. Others can succeed, but often must first translate themselves into the prevailing code.
The observation is not an indictment of standards per se. Common norms can coordinate learning and protect time for instruction. The problem arises when one class’s cultural toolkit is treated as universal, while other ways of knowing and communicating are marked as deficits. That framing can produce tracking, disproportionate discipline, and the quiet exclusion of talents that do not fit the template.
Implications follow for policy and practice. Broadening definitions of excellence, diversifying curricular examples and discourse styles, and building bridges to the cultural resources students bring from home can maintain academic expectations without enforcing a single cultural mold. Coleman’s insight remains a reminder that schools teach more than content; they also teach which cultural signals count, and to whom they belong.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|
More Quotes by James
Add to List
