"Even in a society as tightly controlled as Singapore's, the market creates certain forces which perhaps in the long run may lead to democracy"
About this Quote
Peter L. Berger points to a paradox at the heart of modern development: an authoritarian state can embrace markets to fuel prosperity, yet the very dynamics of a market order tend to loosen centralized control. Singapore, long praised for efficiency and discipline under a dominant party, became a showcase for the promise and the tension. Markets need rules that are predictable rather than personal, courts that hew to contracts, and flows of information that connect to the world. As those institutions deepen, they cultivate habits of autonomy and negotiation that are hard to confine to the realm of commerce alone.
Economic growth also reshapes society. A larger, educated middle class develops interests that go beyond stability and consumption; it often seeks voice, accountability, and safeguards against arbitrary power. Entrepreneurs, professionals, and global firms rely on transparent regulation and plural centers of expertise, which can diversify power away from the state. Exposure to international norms through trade, finance, and education imports ideas about rights and participation that sit uneasily with tight political control.
Berger is careful, though, speaking of forces that perhaps in the long run may lead to democracy. The path is not automatic. States can capitalize on prosperity to reinforce their legitimacy, co-opt business elites, and deploy sophisticated forms of soft control. Singapore, by design, has shown that markets can coexist with constrained politics. Elsewhere, South Korea and Taiwan suggest that as economies complexify, bargaining among multiple interests eventually spills into political liberalization. The market does not guarantee democracy, but it pluralizes society, diffuses authority, and creates arenas where citizens learn to organize, demand reasons, and hold decision-makers to standards.
By choosing Singapore as a stringent test case, Berger underscores a modest but powerful claim: even under comprehensive control, market logic plants seeds of pluralism that time and complexity may coax toward democratic forms.
Economic growth also reshapes society. A larger, educated middle class develops interests that go beyond stability and consumption; it often seeks voice, accountability, and safeguards against arbitrary power. Entrepreneurs, professionals, and global firms rely on transparent regulation and plural centers of expertise, which can diversify power away from the state. Exposure to international norms through trade, finance, and education imports ideas about rights and participation that sit uneasily with tight political control.
Berger is careful, though, speaking of forces that perhaps in the long run may lead to democracy. The path is not automatic. States can capitalize on prosperity to reinforce their legitimacy, co-opt business elites, and deploy sophisticated forms of soft control. Singapore, by design, has shown that markets can coexist with constrained politics. Elsewhere, South Korea and Taiwan suggest that as economies complexify, bargaining among multiple interests eventually spills into political liberalization. The market does not guarantee democracy, but it pluralizes society, diffuses authority, and creates arenas where citizens learn to organize, demand reasons, and hold decision-makers to standards.
By choosing Singapore as a stringent test case, Berger underscores a modest but powerful claim: even under comprehensive control, market logic plants seeds of pluralism that time and complexity may coax toward democratic forms.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Peter
Add to List
