"I believe in competition"
About this Quote
The phrase is terse, almost a creed, and it fits the life of Craig Benson, a tech entrepreneur turned New Hampshire governor. Coming out of the high-velocity networking industry, where companies live or die by how quickly they innovate, a belief in competition is not just ideology but muscle memory. Rivalry forces clarity: prices have to make sense, products have to work, service has to improve, or customers walk. In that world, competition is the most reliable auditor, the constant stress test that reveals flaws and rewards ingenuity.
There is also a civic dimension. As a politician shaped by boardroom realities, Benson often argued that public institutions should borrow the disciplines that make markets dynamic. Competition among vendors can reduce costs and improve quality in government procurement. Transparent benchmarks can pit ideas and agencies against measurable results, nudging them to do better. Electoral competition, too, keeps leaders responsive. The underlying thread is accountability: when alternatives exist, complacency becomes expensive.
Yet the credo is not a blank check for winner-take-all behavior. Effective competition depends on rules that keep the contest fair and the field open. Without guardrails, rivalry can devolve into monopoly, regulatory capture, or a race to the bottom. The insight, then, is to marry the creative pressure of the marketplace with standards that protect trust, safety, and long-term investment. In technology, that balance often separates breakthroughs that scale from flashes that burn out; in governance, it separates reform from churn.
Coming from New Hampshire’s Live Free or Die ethos and a career spent battling formidable incumbents, the belief carries a pragmatic optimism: if people and organizations are free to try, to compare, and to choose, better solutions will emerge. It is faith in a process rather than a promise of easy outcomes, and it places confidence in the relentless, sometimes uncomfortable, engine of improvement.
There is also a civic dimension. As a politician shaped by boardroom realities, Benson often argued that public institutions should borrow the disciplines that make markets dynamic. Competition among vendors can reduce costs and improve quality in government procurement. Transparent benchmarks can pit ideas and agencies against measurable results, nudging them to do better. Electoral competition, too, keeps leaders responsive. The underlying thread is accountability: when alternatives exist, complacency becomes expensive.
Yet the credo is not a blank check for winner-take-all behavior. Effective competition depends on rules that keep the contest fair and the field open. Without guardrails, rivalry can devolve into monopoly, regulatory capture, or a race to the bottom. The insight, then, is to marry the creative pressure of the marketplace with standards that protect trust, safety, and long-term investment. In technology, that balance often separates breakthroughs that scale from flashes that burn out; in governance, it separates reform from churn.
Coming from New Hampshire’s Live Free or Die ethos and a career spent battling formidable incumbents, the belief carries a pragmatic optimism: if people and organizations are free to try, to compare, and to choose, better solutions will emerge. It is faith in a process rather than a promise of easy outcomes, and it places confidence in the relentless, sometimes uncomfortable, engine of improvement.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|
More Quotes by Craig
Add to List
