"With competition everyone has to try harder"
About this Quote
“With competition everyone has to try harder” carries the brisk certainty of a bench remark: not lyrical, not philosophical, but pointedly normative. Coming from a judge, it reads less like a pep talk and more like a justification for a system that runs on pressure. Greene’s specific intent is to legitimize competition as an organizing principle - a force that disciplines individuals and institutions into higher performance. The sentence is built like a rule: competition produces effort; effort produces improvement. Clean. Efficient. Hard to argue with in the abstract.
The subtext is where it sharpens. “Has to” isn’t encouragement; it’s compulsion. Greene isn’t praising the joy of striving, he’s underscoring constraint: in a competitive environment, opting out becomes costly, sometimes impossible. That aligns with a judicial worldview attuned to incentives, deterrence, and predictable behavior. The implicit claim is that humans respond to structure more reliably than to virtue. If you want better outcomes, don’t moralize - engineer the conditions.
Contextually, judges often encounter competition in its institutional forms: antitrust disputes, labor conflicts, bidding wars, admissions fights, and the endless question of whether markets and rivalry serve the public or merely reward the already-equipped. The line echoes a late-20th-century American confidence in market logic, when “competition” was treated as a civic good that would keep everyone honest. It works rhetorically because it’s frictionless and vaguely democratic: everyone, not just the ambitious, gets pulled into the same treadmill. But the neatness also hides the darker corollary: harder for whom, and at what cost? Competition raises effort, yes - and it can also raise burnout, corner-cutting, and inequality. Greene’s sentence is persuasive precisely because it leaves those second-order effects off the record.
The subtext is where it sharpens. “Has to” isn’t encouragement; it’s compulsion. Greene isn’t praising the joy of striving, he’s underscoring constraint: in a competitive environment, opting out becomes costly, sometimes impossible. That aligns with a judicial worldview attuned to incentives, deterrence, and predictable behavior. The implicit claim is that humans respond to structure more reliably than to virtue. If you want better outcomes, don’t moralize - engineer the conditions.
Contextually, judges often encounter competition in its institutional forms: antitrust disputes, labor conflicts, bidding wars, admissions fights, and the endless question of whether markets and rivalry serve the public or merely reward the already-equipped. The line echoes a late-20th-century American confidence in market logic, when “competition” was treated as a civic good that would keep everyone honest. It works rhetorically because it’s frictionless and vaguely democratic: everyone, not just the ambitious, gets pulled into the same treadmill. But the neatness also hides the darker corollary: harder for whom, and at what cost? Competition raises effort, yes - and it can also raise burnout, corner-cutting, and inequality. Greene’s sentence is persuasive precisely because it leaves those second-order effects off the record.
Quote Details
| Topic | Motivational |
|---|
More Quotes by Harold
Add to List







