"I think that gay marriage should be between a man and a woman"
About this Quote
It lands like a glitch in the matrix: a sentence that tries to wear the costume of tolerance while smuggling in its opposite. Schwarzenegger’s line is memorable because it’s internally contradictory on purpose, a bit of political ventriloquism from an era when public figures wanted the sheen of being “reasonable” without paying the price of taking a real stand. The phrasing borrows the respectful cadence of pro-equality language (“I think that… should be”) and then snaps back to the old definition, as if the speaker can acknowledge the topic’s moral momentum while still anchoring it to tradition.
The intent isn’t so much to argue as to manage risk. As a celebrity-turned-politician, Schwarzenegger was always selling a broad coalition: Hollywood moderates, conservative donors, independent voters, immigrant success-story admirers. This line performs triangulation in one breath, signaling “I’m not a bigot, I’m just practical,” even as it reasserts exclusion. It’s politics as brand protection.
The subtext is anxiety about change: the fear that redefining marriage means ceding cultural ground. That’s why the sentence reaches for a heteronormative anchor (“man and a woman”) instead of engaging the actual question of rights and recognition. It reduces a civil-rights issue to a semantic boundary, hoping the debate can be contained by definition.
Context matters: mid-2000s America, when gay marriage was accelerating through courts and ballot measures, and many public figures tried to speak in a code that sounded modern while remaining safely backward-looking. The line survives because it captures that awkward historical hinge moment - progress arriving, and people trying to negotiate with it.
The intent isn’t so much to argue as to manage risk. As a celebrity-turned-politician, Schwarzenegger was always selling a broad coalition: Hollywood moderates, conservative donors, independent voters, immigrant success-story admirers. This line performs triangulation in one breath, signaling “I’m not a bigot, I’m just practical,” even as it reasserts exclusion. It’s politics as brand protection.
The subtext is anxiety about change: the fear that redefining marriage means ceding cultural ground. That’s why the sentence reaches for a heteronormative anchor (“man and a woman”) instead of engaging the actual question of rights and recognition. It reduces a civil-rights issue to a semantic boundary, hoping the debate can be contained by definition.
Context matters: mid-2000s America, when gay marriage was accelerating through courts and ballot measures, and many public figures tried to speak in a code that sounded modern while remaining safely backward-looking. The line survives because it captures that awkward historical hinge moment - progress arriving, and people trying to negotiate with it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Unverified source: CNN: Arnold on the Issues (recall election talk radio) (Arnold Schwarzenegger, 2003)
Evidence: Primary-source evidence of the quote comes from CNN’s transcript excerpting audio from “The Sean Hannity Show” (talk radio). In the transcript, Hannity asks “Do you support gay marriage?” Schwarzenegger replies that he supports domestic partnership, but not gay marriage, and says: “No. I think th... Other candidates (2) The Mammoth Book of Comic Quotes (Geoff Tibballs, 2012) compilation96.2% ... I think that gay marriage should be between a man and a woman . ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER ( on the attraction of fame... Arnold Schwarzenegger (Arnold Schwarzenegger) compilation40.0% ything that should scare you you should be proud that you werent afraid not emba |
More Quotes by Arnold
Add to List




