"If we go on explaining we shall cease to understand one another"
About this Quote
Diplomacy runs on a paradox: the more precisely you define a commitment, the less room you leave for everyone to pretend they got what they wanted. Talleyrand’s line is a sleek warning from a man who made ambiguity a tool of statecraft. “Explaining” here isn’t clarity as a virtue; it’s over-clarification as a provocation. Keep talking long enough and you force hidden assumptions into the open, you corner your counterpart into defending pride, and you turn a workable arrangement into a semantic trial.
The subtext is almost coldly practical: mutual understanding is often a negotiated illusion. Nations, factions, and egos can coexist inside a shared phrase exactly because that phrase is elastic. Explanation tightens the elastic until it snaps. In Talleyrand’s world - post-Revolutionary France, Napoleonic upheaval, the Congress of Vienna - stability depended on papering over incompatible aims with language everyone could sign without fully endorsing. His genius was to preserve the option to maneuver tomorrow by refusing to litigate every meaning today.
There’s also a jab at rationalist purity. The Enlightenment fantasy says if we just define terms, we’ll converge on truth. Talleyrand, a cleric-turned-power-broker who watched ideals curdle into terror, suggests the opposite: too much “reason” becomes a weapon. Explanation can be a demand for surrender disguised as honesty.
Read it now and it sounds like a rebuke to our culture of receipts and hyper-clarity: the insistence that every statement be fully explicated, every ambiguity eliminated. Talleyrand reminds us that some agreements survive only because we stop interrogating them.
The subtext is almost coldly practical: mutual understanding is often a negotiated illusion. Nations, factions, and egos can coexist inside a shared phrase exactly because that phrase is elastic. Explanation tightens the elastic until it snaps. In Talleyrand’s world - post-Revolutionary France, Napoleonic upheaval, the Congress of Vienna - stability depended on papering over incompatible aims with language everyone could sign without fully endorsing. His genius was to preserve the option to maneuver tomorrow by refusing to litigate every meaning today.
There’s also a jab at rationalist purity. The Enlightenment fantasy says if we just define terms, we’ll converge on truth. Talleyrand, a cleric-turned-power-broker who watched ideals curdle into terror, suggests the opposite: too much “reason” becomes a weapon. Explanation can be a demand for surrender disguised as honesty.
Read it now and it sounds like a rebuke to our culture of receipts and hyper-clarity: the insistence that every statement be fully explicated, every ambiguity eliminated. Talleyrand reminds us that some agreements survive only because we stop interrogating them.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List
