"We can sometimes love what we do not understand, but it is impossible completely to understand what we do not love"
About this Quote
The aphorism turns common wisdom on its head by claiming that love can come before knowledge, while knowledge without love cannot reach completion. Affection can bloom in the presence of mystery: we cherish an infant long before we grasp who they are; we are moved by a painting whose symbolism escapes us; we feel loyalty to a place we cannot fully map. That first clause is generous about human feeling. Yet the second sets a harder standard. To understand completely requires a posture of care. Love, in this sense, is not mere sentiment but patient attention, humility, and willingness to be changed by what we encounter. Without that devotion, analysis stays on the surface. Facts can be correct and still be partial if they lack the sympathetic imagination that penetrates motives, contexts, and meanings.
The sentiment suits Anna Jameson, a 19th-century critic and early feminist whose work braided discernment with empathy. In writing about Shakespeares heroines and about sacred and legendary art, she argued that interpretation demands reverent notice of character, intention, and cultural frame. Her era often set reason and feeling at odds; Jameson blends them, closer to the Romantic confidence that emotion is a mode of knowing. The claim is also quietly ethical. To study people, traditions, or artworks without love risks turning them into objects; with love, they remain subjects, meeting us halfway.
The word completely matters. Curiosity and method can explain mechanisms, but the fullness of understanding persons, communities, or enduring works arrives only when care sustains the long labor of interpretation. Love steadies attention through ambiguity, resists hasty judgment, and keeps us from treating difference as defect. The maxim therefore challenges both cold detachment and blind infatuation. Admiration without insight is fragile; insight without love is brittle. When love and understanding cooperate, knowledge becomes not only accurate but wise, and the object of study can disclose itself more fully.
The sentiment suits Anna Jameson, a 19th-century critic and early feminist whose work braided discernment with empathy. In writing about Shakespeares heroines and about sacred and legendary art, she argued that interpretation demands reverent notice of character, intention, and cultural frame. Her era often set reason and feeling at odds; Jameson blends them, closer to the Romantic confidence that emotion is a mode of knowing. The claim is also quietly ethical. To study people, traditions, or artworks without love risks turning them into objects; with love, they remain subjects, meeting us halfway.
The word completely matters. Curiosity and method can explain mechanisms, but the fullness of understanding persons, communities, or enduring works arrives only when care sustains the long labor of interpretation. Love steadies attention through ambiguity, resists hasty judgment, and keeps us from treating difference as defect. The maxim therefore challenges both cold detachment and blind infatuation. Admiration without insight is fragile; insight without love is brittle. When love and understanding cooperate, knowledge becomes not only accurate but wise, and the object of study can disclose itself more fully.
Quote Details
| Topic | Love |
|---|
More Quotes by Anna
Add to List
