"It is a sad thing when men have neither the wit to speak well nor the judgment to hold their tongues"
About this Quote
A well-aimed insult disguised as etiquette advice, La Bruyere's line lands because it treats bad speech not as a harmless quirk but as a moral and social failure. He builds a trap with a clean either-or: you can contribute with wit, or you can contribute by abstaining. If you lack both, you're not merely boring; you're dangerous to the room. The sadness isn't sentimental. It's the weary disappointment of someone watching a society that mistakes noise for presence.
The subtext is courtly, and cutting. In Louis XIV's France, conversation was power: salons, patronage networks, and the Versailles ecosystem ran on reputation and performance. "Wit" wasn't just cleverness; it was a form of social intelligence, a calibrated ability to read the moment and signal belonging. "Judgment" is the deeper virtue, the one that keeps vanity from turning into public self-sabotage. La Bruyere isn't celebrating silence for its own sake. He's arguing for self-command: knowing when speech serves something larger than the ego.
The quote also sneaks in a bleak anthropology. People don't simply fail to speak well; they fail to recognize that they are failing. That second deficit is what makes the first intolerable. It's an early diagnosis of a timeless type: the person who treats every pause as an invitation and every audience as entitlement. La Bruyere's brilliance is to render that figure not outrageous but sad - because a culture full of them can't think, only chatter.
The subtext is courtly, and cutting. In Louis XIV's France, conversation was power: salons, patronage networks, and the Versailles ecosystem ran on reputation and performance. "Wit" wasn't just cleverness; it was a form of social intelligence, a calibrated ability to read the moment and signal belonging. "Judgment" is the deeper virtue, the one that keeps vanity from turning into public self-sabotage. La Bruyere isn't celebrating silence for its own sake. He's arguing for self-command: knowing when speech serves something larger than the ego.
The quote also sneaks in a bleak anthropology. People don't simply fail to speak well; they fail to recognize that they are failing. That second deficit is what makes the first intolerable. It's an early diagnosis of a timeless type: the person who treats every pause as an invitation and every audience as entitlement. La Bruyere's brilliance is to render that figure not outrageous but sad - because a culture full of them can't think, only chatter.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jean
Add to List












