"It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence"
About this Quote
William Kingdon Clifford lays down an austere moral rule: believing without sufficient evidence is a moral wrong, no matter who does it or where. The claim comes from his 1877 essay The Ethics of Belief, written in a Victorian culture wrestling with the authority of science and the pull of religious faith. Clifford, a mathematician and philosopher, treats believing not as a private mental luxury but as a public act that shapes behavior and, through behavior, the lives of others.
He illustrates this with the story of a shipowner who convinces himself, against doubts and without proper inspection, that his vessel is seaworthy. The ship sinks and people die. Clifford’s verdict is stark: even if the ship had not sunk, the belief would still have been wrong, because it was acquired irresponsibly. What matters is not the outcome but the discipline of inquiry. Beliefs are habits of mind that spread by testimony and example; careless belief breeds a culture of credulity, and that is a social harm.
The maxim is absolutist, which is part of its point. It demands that we proportion belief to evidence, suspend judgment where evidence is lacking, and remain ready to revise. It extends intellectual honesty into the realm of ethics: there is such a thing as doxastic responsibility, a duty to check, to listen, to doubt, to justify. The rule also raises hard questions. What counts as sufficient evidence? Must ordinary trust in others violate it? And what about decisions under uncertainty, where waiting for evidence carries its own risks?
William James would later reply that some options are forced, living, and momentous, and that faith can be permissible when evidence cannot arrive in time. Even so, Clifford’s challenge endures. In an age of misinformation and viral rumor, the discipline he urges functions as a civic virtue. It asks for courage to say I do not know, patience to inquire, and integrity to believe only what has earned belief.
He illustrates this with the story of a shipowner who convinces himself, against doubts and without proper inspection, that his vessel is seaworthy. The ship sinks and people die. Clifford’s verdict is stark: even if the ship had not sunk, the belief would still have been wrong, because it was acquired irresponsibly. What matters is not the outcome but the discipline of inquiry. Beliefs are habits of mind that spread by testimony and example; careless belief breeds a culture of credulity, and that is a social harm.
The maxim is absolutist, which is part of its point. It demands that we proportion belief to evidence, suspend judgment where evidence is lacking, and remain ready to revise. It extends intellectual honesty into the realm of ethics: there is such a thing as doxastic responsibility, a duty to check, to listen, to doubt, to justify. The rule also raises hard questions. What counts as sufficient evidence? Must ordinary trust in others violate it? And what about decisions under uncertainty, where waiting for evidence carries its own risks?
William James would later reply that some options are forced, living, and momentous, and that faith can be permissible when evidence cannot arrive in time. Even so, Clifford’s challenge endures. In an age of misinformation and viral rumor, the discipline he urges functions as a civic virtue. It asks for courage to say I do not know, patience to inquire, and integrity to believe only what has earned belief.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | William K. Clifford, "The Ethics of Belief", Contemporary Review (Jan. 1877) — famous opening line; reprinted in Lectures and Essays (1879). |
More Quotes by William
Add to List





