"To sum up: it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence"
About this Quote
Clifford doesn’t merely recommend skepticism; he moralizes it. “Wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone” is a mathematician’s version of a thunderclap: universal quantifiers turned into ethical law. The line reads like a theorem with no edge cases, a deliberate affront to the cozy idea that belief is private, harmless, or purely emotional. He’s not arguing that bad evidence leads to bad conclusions. He’s arguing that the act of believing carelessly is itself a civic offense.
The subtext is Victorian and strikingly modern: beliefs are not sealed inside the skull. They leak into behavior, votes, purchases, prejudices, parenting, war. Clifford wrote in an era when religious authority still claimed public muscle while science was rapidly rewiring what counted as “knowledge.” His target isn’t faith alone; it’s intellectual slackness dressed up as sincerity. “To sum up” signals he thinks the case is already made, and the closing sentence is a kind of prosecutorial sentence: you don’t get to plead temperament, tradition, or good intentions.
What makes the line work is its audacity. The absolute language is rhetorically risky because it invites obvious counterexamples (love, trust, everyday assumptions). Clifford uses that risk as pressure: he forces the reader to feel how often we rely on vibes and social permission rather than proof. It’s an ethic designed for a crowded world, where one person’s “harmless” credulity becomes everyone else’s problem. In an attention economy that monetizes belief, Clifford’s severity sounds less puritan than prescient.
The subtext is Victorian and strikingly modern: beliefs are not sealed inside the skull. They leak into behavior, votes, purchases, prejudices, parenting, war. Clifford wrote in an era when religious authority still claimed public muscle while science was rapidly rewiring what counted as “knowledge.” His target isn’t faith alone; it’s intellectual slackness dressed up as sincerity. “To sum up” signals he thinks the case is already made, and the closing sentence is a kind of prosecutorial sentence: you don’t get to plead temperament, tradition, or good intentions.
What makes the line work is its audacity. The absolute language is rhetorically risky because it invites obvious counterexamples (love, trust, everyday assumptions). Clifford uses that risk as pressure: he forces the reader to feel how often we rely on vibes and social permission rather than proof. It’s an ethic designed for a crowded world, where one person’s “harmless” credulity becomes everyone else’s problem. In an attention economy that monetizes belief, Clifford’s severity sounds less puritan than prescient.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | William K. Clifford, "The Ethics of Belief" (1877), essay (originally in Contemporary Review); source of the oft‑cited line about believing only on sufficient evidence. |
More Quotes by William
Add to List





