"It seems to me that any sensible person must see that violence does not change the world and if it does, then only temporarily"

Martin Scorsese's quote highlights a perception about the restrictions and short lived efficiency of violence as a method of enacting modification. The essence of the statement is rooted in a wider philosophical and ethical view that sees violence as a flawed tool for achieving sustainable and meaningful change in society.

To start with, when Scorsese declares that "any practical individual should see" the ineffectiveness of violence, he is attracting reasoning and factor. He suggests that a clear understanding of historic contexts and human behavior rapidly reveals violence as an inadequate technique for resolving conflicts or effecting true change. In history, transformations and wars have actually certainly modified the course of countries and societies but often at a remarkable human expense and usually without dealing with the underlying issues efficiently.

The phrase "does not alter the world" reiterates the belief that violence, while having the possible to move class structure or force temporary compliance, does not have the ability to make enduring positive shifts. Rather, violence can lead to cyclical retaliation, perpetuating a legacy of dispute rather than resolution. Such outcomes contrast with modifications attained through peaceful methods, which tend to be more profound and sustainable, as they typically involve dialogue, mutual understanding, and cooperation.

Scorsese's assertion that if violence alters the world, it does so "just temporarily" acknowledges that while violent actions can develop immediate outcomes, these are typically delicate and ultimately give way to deeper, systemic forces that withstand change if not resolved. The short-term change indicates that violence may suppress problems for a short while, but without attending to root causes, such as inequality, oppression, or ideological distinctions, long-term resolution remains elusive.

Eventually, Scorsese's viewpoint motivates a reflection on how societal battles for modification can be more successfully and fairly browsed through non-violent means, highlighting the power of human interaction, empathy, and collective analytical as more viable paths to sustaining peace and improvement.