"Let me say again that the relationship is asymmetrical: there's no democracy without a market economy, but you can have a market economy without democracy"
About this Quote
Peter L. Berger draws a sharp line between two modern institutions often assumed to rise and fall together. He argues that democracy depends on a market economy, while a market economy can thrive under non-democratic rule. The asymmetry matters because it punctures the easy belief that economic liberalization automatically produces political freedom.
The dependence runs through institutions and incentives. Markets disperse economic power across firms, households, and associations. That dispersion underwrites civil society: independent media, voluntary organizations, universities, churches, and advocacy groups that can fund themselves without state patronage. A market order pushes toward rule of law, enforceable contracts, and predictable property rights. These features cultivate habits of bargaining, compromise, and self-organization crucial to political pluralism. When the state controls all economic life, dissenters have no independent base; coercion becomes the default tool of coordination. Hence the historical affinity between command economies and one-party rule.
The reverse, Berger cautions, does not hold. Authoritarian governments can sponsor or tolerate markets to generate growth, tax revenues, and legitimacy, while tightly policing parties, press, and courts. China is the obvious case; Singapore and Pinochet-era Chile are often cited. Markets reward compliance with rules of exchange, not with rights of voice. They can coexist with censorship and surveillance so long as contracts are predictable for favored constituencies.
The argument arose within late twentieth-century debates over modernization, when many expected prosperity to yield democracy. Berger, a sociologist of development and religion, observed the evidence and separated economic from political liberalization. The policy implication is sobering: trade or investment alone will not deliver democratic institutions, and democratic activists should not erode market pluralism in ways that starve civil society.
Democracy needs the plural, law-bound, information-rich ecology a market economy tends to generate, but markets by themselves do not create accountability or equal citizenship. Those are political achievements, won and defended in arenas that no price mechanism can substitute for.
The dependence runs through institutions and incentives. Markets disperse economic power across firms, households, and associations. That dispersion underwrites civil society: independent media, voluntary organizations, universities, churches, and advocacy groups that can fund themselves without state patronage. A market order pushes toward rule of law, enforceable contracts, and predictable property rights. These features cultivate habits of bargaining, compromise, and self-organization crucial to political pluralism. When the state controls all economic life, dissenters have no independent base; coercion becomes the default tool of coordination. Hence the historical affinity between command economies and one-party rule.
The reverse, Berger cautions, does not hold. Authoritarian governments can sponsor or tolerate markets to generate growth, tax revenues, and legitimacy, while tightly policing parties, press, and courts. China is the obvious case; Singapore and Pinochet-era Chile are often cited. Markets reward compliance with rules of exchange, not with rights of voice. They can coexist with censorship and surveillance so long as contracts are predictable for favored constituencies.
The argument arose within late twentieth-century debates over modernization, when many expected prosperity to yield democracy. Berger, a sociologist of development and religion, observed the evidence and separated economic from political liberalization. The policy implication is sobering: trade or investment alone will not deliver democratic institutions, and democratic activists should not erode market pluralism in ways that starve civil society.
Democracy needs the plural, law-bound, information-rich ecology a market economy tends to generate, but markets by themselves do not create accountability or equal citizenship. Those are political achievements, won and defended in arenas that no price mechanism can substitute for.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Peter
Add to List
