"Morality is the theory that every human act must be either right or wrong, and that 99 % of them are wrong"
About this Quote
Mencken distills his satirical view of moralism into a neat paradox: a system that claims to clarify human conduct by dividing it into right and wrong ends up licensing blanket condemnation. The punch line is the 99 percent, a mock statistic that highlights the zeal of those who find vice everywhere. By calling morality a theory, he implies an ideology more than a humane practice, a set of rigid abstractions laid over the unruly variety of life.
The target is not ethical reflection itself but moralism, especially the Puritan strain he dissected all his career. Mencken loved to say that Puritanism is the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy. In the early 20th-century United States, that fear animated crusades against drink, sex, and dissent: Prohibition, Comstock laws, censorship, and campaigns to regulate popular entertainment. Mencken covered the Scopes Trial with relish, portraying fundamentalists and uplift reformers as busybodies mistaking their anxieties for universal law. The quip channels that stance: when morality is treated as an infallible measuring rod, almost any spontaneous pleasure, oddity, or divergence will be stamped wrong.
There is a deeper philosophical jab at binary ethics. Life presents trade-offs, mixed motives, partial knowledge, and contexts where intentions and outcomes refuse clean sorting. A mentality that insists every act must be graded right or wrong is bound to simplify and punish, because it cannot tolerate ambiguity. Mencken, influenced by his reading of Nietzsche, suspected that such systems often express resentment and the desire to control, not wisdom. His ridicule invites a more skeptical, pluralistic ethic: fewer proclamations, more humility; less policing of private behavior, more tolerance of difference.
The humor sharpens the point. By exaggerating the rate of wrongdoing, he exposes the scolding posture as absurd, yet common. The line endures because it warns how easily moral language, once absolutized, becomes a tool for suspicion rather than a guide to living well.
The target is not ethical reflection itself but moralism, especially the Puritan strain he dissected all his career. Mencken loved to say that Puritanism is the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy. In the early 20th-century United States, that fear animated crusades against drink, sex, and dissent: Prohibition, Comstock laws, censorship, and campaigns to regulate popular entertainment. Mencken covered the Scopes Trial with relish, portraying fundamentalists and uplift reformers as busybodies mistaking their anxieties for universal law. The quip channels that stance: when morality is treated as an infallible measuring rod, almost any spontaneous pleasure, oddity, or divergence will be stamped wrong.
There is a deeper philosophical jab at binary ethics. Life presents trade-offs, mixed motives, partial knowledge, and contexts where intentions and outcomes refuse clean sorting. A mentality that insists every act must be graded right or wrong is bound to simplify and punish, because it cannot tolerate ambiguity. Mencken, influenced by his reading of Nietzsche, suspected that such systems often express resentment and the desire to control, not wisdom. His ridicule invites a more skeptical, pluralistic ethic: fewer proclamations, more humility; less policing of private behavior, more tolerance of difference.
The humor sharpens the point. By exaggerating the rate of wrongdoing, he exposes the scolding posture as absurd, yet common. The line endures because it warns how easily moral language, once absolutized, becomes a tool for suspicion rather than a guide to living well.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by L. Mencken
Add to List
