"Nature seems at each man's birth to have marked out the bounds of his virtues and vices, and to have determined how good or how wicked that man shall be capable of being"
About this Quote
La Rochefoucauld’s line lands like a compliment to humility and a quiet insult to moral heroism. He’s not arguing that people are born good or bad; he’s arguing they’re born with a moral ceiling. Nature, in his telling, doesn’t just hand out temperaments. It pre-allocates the maximum range of “virtues and vices” each person can realistically perform. That’s the sting: your saintliness might be less achievement than operating within a preset capacity, and your depravity might be less rebellion than staying true to your design.
The intent is classic Rochefoucauld: puncture flattering stories we tell about ourselves. In a court culture built on performance, reputation, and strategic piety, the notion of free-floating virtue was often just another costume. By framing morality as bounded, he makes self-congratulation look naive and moral condemnation look simplistic. People can choose, sure, but only among options their nature makes available. It’s a proto-psychological realism dressed as fatalism.
The subtext is also political. If virtue is scarce and unevenly distributed, then institutions shouldn’t be built on expectations of widespread nobility. They should be built to manage vanity, ambition, and self-interest - the reliable fuels of social life. That’s why the sentence feels cold: it quietly demotes ethics from a triumph of will to a function of wiring.
Written in the wake of civil unrest and amid aristocratic intrigue, it reads less like despair than like defensive clarity: don’t gamble your life on people becoming better than they are capable of being.
The intent is classic Rochefoucauld: puncture flattering stories we tell about ourselves. In a court culture built on performance, reputation, and strategic piety, the notion of free-floating virtue was often just another costume. By framing morality as bounded, he makes self-congratulation look naive and moral condemnation look simplistic. People can choose, sure, but only among options their nature makes available. It’s a proto-psychological realism dressed as fatalism.
The subtext is also political. If virtue is scarce and unevenly distributed, then institutions shouldn’t be built on expectations of widespread nobility. They should be built to manage vanity, ambition, and self-interest - the reliable fuels of social life. That’s why the sentence feels cold: it quietly demotes ethics from a triumph of will to a function of wiring.
Written in the wake of civil unrest and amid aristocratic intrigue, it reads less like despair than like defensive clarity: don’t gamble your life on people becoming better than they are capable of being.
Quote Details
| Topic | Free Will & Fate |
|---|---|
| Source | Maxims (Maximes) — François de La Rochefoucauld; English translations of his Maxims include this aphorism (see linked Wikiquote entry). |
More Quotes by Francois
Add to List
