"So, anything that avoids a conflict that could draw in, unhappily again, outside powers such as the United States or revisit, for example, Japan's interests in the Taiwan area would be the last thing that anyone would want"

The quote by William Kirby highlights the intricacies and level of sensitivities associated with geopolitical conflicts, with a specific concentrate on the Taiwan area and the potential participation of major international powers. Kirby is stressing the undesirability of any conflict that could escalate to include countries with substantial military and economic impact, such as the United States, in addition to regional stakeholders like Japan.

The phrase "unhappily again" recommends a historic context where external powers have actually formerly been drawn into conflicts in the region, causing unwanted outcomes. This can be seen as a referral to past international engagements in Asian disputes, such as the Korean War or the Vietnam War, where foreign interventions resulted in prolonged and expensive participations.

Kirby's mention of Japan's interests suggests that Taiwan's stability is not just a matter of cross-strait relations but also of significant issue to surrounding nations. Japan, offered its proximity and historic ties, has a beneficial interest in the peace and stability of the Taiwan Strait.

By mentioning "would be the last thing that anybody would want," Kirby suggests an agreement among rational actors versus intensifying tensions to a point where they might jeopardize local and worldwide peace. This reflects the understanding that in today's globalized world, the effects of conflict extend far beyond the instant celebrations included. Military confrontations including significant powers might let loose prevalent financial and humanitarian crises, interrupting worldwide trade and security.

In essence, the quote serves as a cautionary reminder of the precarious nature of worldwide relations concerning Taiwan. Kirby supporters for diplomatic options and supporting measures that would avoid the escalation of stress into armed conflict, hence preventing the involvement of external powers and the repeat of historical patterns of intervention and dispute.