"The only positive finding which could be drawn from the first series, was the conclusion that the relationships obviously had a more complicated lay-out than had been thought, for the effects were so varied that no obedience to any law could be discovered"
About this Quote
Scientific progress rarely arrives as a trumpet blast; more often it limps in as a negative result that refuses to behave. Hess, a physiologist working in an era hungry for clean mechanistic “laws,” is doing something quietly subversive here: treating failure not as embarrassment but as data with teeth. The “only positive finding” is almost a deadpan joke, but it’s also a methodological manifesto. If the outcomes are “so varied” that no law appears, the experiment hasn’t proven nothing; it has proven the system is more layered than the reigning model allows.
The phrasing matters. “Lay-out” suggests circuitry, architecture, wiring - not a single lever that can be pulled, but a design with branching routes and feedback. That choice reflects early 20th-century biology’s pivot away from simple stimulus-response stories toward networks, regulation, and emergent behavior. Hess is essentially flagging that the body (and especially the brain, his main terrain) is not a billiard table.
There’s an ethical subtext, too, aimed at the culture of scientific certainty. “No obedience to any law” reads like a jab at the temptation to force messy observations into tidy theories. He’s warning against premature closure: when variability spikes, the responsible move isn’t to manufacture a law; it’s to revise the question, refine the instruments, and accept that the organism is not obligated to satisfy our categories.
Contextually, this is the voice of a lab scientist documenting a first series - early passes, coarse maps - and resisting the seduction of overinterpretation. The restraint is the point, and it’s how real discovery keeps its credibility.
The phrasing matters. “Lay-out” suggests circuitry, architecture, wiring - not a single lever that can be pulled, but a design with branching routes and feedback. That choice reflects early 20th-century biology’s pivot away from simple stimulus-response stories toward networks, regulation, and emergent behavior. Hess is essentially flagging that the body (and especially the brain, his main terrain) is not a billiard table.
There’s an ethical subtext, too, aimed at the culture of scientific certainty. “No obedience to any law” reads like a jab at the temptation to force messy observations into tidy theories. He’s warning against premature closure: when variability spikes, the responsible move isn’t to manufacture a law; it’s to revise the question, refine the instruments, and accept that the organism is not obligated to satisfy our categories.
Contextually, this is the voice of a lab scientist documenting a first series - early passes, coarse maps - and resisting the seduction of overinterpretation. The restraint is the point, and it’s how real discovery keeps its credibility.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Walter
Add to List
