"The only way to create a foundational document that could stand the test of time was to build in enough flexibility that later generations would be able to adapt it to their own needs and uses"
About this Quote
A constitution that "stands the test of time" by refusing to stand still: Diane Wood frames durability as a kind of planned obsolescence. The line is doing quiet polemical work. It rejects the nostalgic fantasy that legitimacy comes from freezing a founding moment in amber, and it recasts flexibility not as a loophole but as the core engineering principle. "Only way" is the tell. Wood isn’t offering a mild preference for interpretive openness; she’s asserting that rigidity is a design failure.
As a judge, Wood is also speaking into a live American argument: originalism versus a constitutionalism that treats text as a framework rather than a museum label. Her phrasing is careful, lawyerly, and strategic. "Foundational document" sounds neutral, almost architectural, but it smuggles in a value judgment: foundations are meant to support renovations, not forbid them. The emphasis on "later generations" shifts authority from founders to the governed over time, making democratic continuity the measure of fidelity. That’s subtext aimed at readers who equate change with betrayal.
"Adapt it to their own needs and uses" is the most pointed clause. Needs and uses are plural, contingent, even messy - the language of lived politics rather than abstract theory. Wood implies that a constitution’s job is to metabolize social transformation (technology, rights claims, new forms of inequality) without collapsing into crisis every time the world updates. In that sense, her quote is less a defense of judicial power than a reminder that the document’s authors, whatever their blind spots, built a system that anticipated their successors would have to do work they could not.
As a judge, Wood is also speaking into a live American argument: originalism versus a constitutionalism that treats text as a framework rather than a museum label. Her phrasing is careful, lawyerly, and strategic. "Foundational document" sounds neutral, almost architectural, but it smuggles in a value judgment: foundations are meant to support renovations, not forbid them. The emphasis on "later generations" shifts authority from founders to the governed over time, making democratic continuity the measure of fidelity. That’s subtext aimed at readers who equate change with betrayal.
"Adapt it to their own needs and uses" is the most pointed clause. Needs and uses are plural, contingent, even messy - the language of lived politics rather than abstract theory. Wood implies that a constitution’s job is to metabolize social transformation (technology, rights claims, new forms of inequality) without collapsing into crisis every time the world updates. In that sense, her quote is less a defense of judicial power than a reminder that the document’s authors, whatever their blind spots, built a system that anticipated their successors would have to do work they could not.
Quote Details
| Topic | Vision & Strategy |
|---|
More Quotes by Diane
Add to List
