"The Pell Grant is more than a financial aid program for college students in need. It is the right thing to do for America's college students, and it is the right thing to do for America's economy"
About this Quote
Norm Coleman frames the Pell Grant as both an ethical commitment and a strategic investment. Created in 1972 and awarded to low-income students as a grant rather than a loan, Pell aims to level the playing field so that talent, not family income, determines educational opportunity. Calling it the right thing to do grounds the program in a moral logic of fairness and mobility, a belief that the country keeps faith with its young people by ensuring that cost is not a veto on aspiration.
Coleman also leans on an economic case. Education enlarges human capital, raising productivity, earnings, and tax revenues over a lifetime. When students who might otherwise forgo college enroll and complete degrees, the payoff ripples outward: stronger local labor markets, more small business formation, and a workforce better aligned with an innovation-driven economy. By reducing the need to borrow, Pell grants free graduates to make choices that benefit the economy, from relocating for jobs to starting companies, rather than being constrained by debt service.
The line carries political nuance. As a Republican senator from Minnesota, Coleman signals that supporting Pell is not simply a social program but a pro-growth policy that rewards effort and expands opportunity. That stance has often attracted bipartisan backing, especially during periods when college costs rose faster than inflation and concerns over student debt mounted in the 2000s. Critics worry about tuition inflation or program costs, but the argument here is that targeted grants yield a strong return, particularly when paired with accountability for completion and pricing.
Underlying the statement is a vision of the social contract reminiscent of the GI Bill: invest in broad access to education, and the nation reaps dividends in innovation, civic strength, and shared prosperity. The Pell Grant, then, is cast not as charity but as infrastructure for mobility and growth, a policy where values and economic self-interest meet.
Coleman also leans on an economic case. Education enlarges human capital, raising productivity, earnings, and tax revenues over a lifetime. When students who might otherwise forgo college enroll and complete degrees, the payoff ripples outward: stronger local labor markets, more small business formation, and a workforce better aligned with an innovation-driven economy. By reducing the need to borrow, Pell grants free graduates to make choices that benefit the economy, from relocating for jobs to starting companies, rather than being constrained by debt service.
The line carries political nuance. As a Republican senator from Minnesota, Coleman signals that supporting Pell is not simply a social program but a pro-growth policy that rewards effort and expands opportunity. That stance has often attracted bipartisan backing, especially during periods when college costs rose faster than inflation and concerns over student debt mounted in the 2000s. Critics worry about tuition inflation or program costs, but the argument here is that targeted grants yield a strong return, particularly when paired with accountability for completion and pricing.
Underlying the statement is a vision of the social contract reminiscent of the GI Bill: invest in broad access to education, and the nation reaps dividends in innovation, civic strength, and shared prosperity. The Pell Grant, then, is cast not as charity but as infrastructure for mobility and growth, a policy where values and economic self-interest meet.
Quote Details
| Topic | Student |
|---|
More Quotes by Norm
Add to List
