"The recognition of the art that informs all pure science need not mean the abandonment for it of all present art, rather it will mean the completion of the transformation of art that has already begun"
About this Quote
Bernal is smuggling a provocation into what sounds like a conciliatory sentence: if you think science is the enemy of art, you’re already missing the deeper point that science itself runs on artistic judgment. “Recognition of the art that informs all pure science” reframes the lab as a studio. He’s pointing to the parts of discovery that can’t be reduced to method alone: choosing a good question, sensing which simplification won’t kill the phenomenon, finding an elegant model, trusting a weird result long enough to test it again. Calling that “art” is tactical. It elevates imagination and form-making without surrendering science’s claim to truth.
The second move is aimed at artists and cultural gatekeepers who fear being displaced by technical modernity. Bernal refuses the melodrama of replacement: acknowledging the artistry in science doesn’t require “the abandonment…of all present art.” Instead, it accelerates a change already underway. That phrase “transformation…that has already begun” lands as a historical diagnosis: modern art, from abstraction to design to cinema, has been absorbing industrial materials, scientific ways of seeing, and new technologies for decades. The future, he implies, isn’t art versus science but art remade by scientific consciousness.
Context matters. Bernal was a crystallographer and a left-leaning public intellectual writing in a century of radar, atomic power, mass production, and state-funded research. In that world, “pure science” is never purely pure; it reorganizes society. His subtext: if science is going to reshape reality at scale, culture can’t afford to treat it as culturally illiterate. Art’s job is not to retreat, but to metabolize the new ways of knowing and, in doing so, complete the shift from ornament to instrument.
The second move is aimed at artists and cultural gatekeepers who fear being displaced by technical modernity. Bernal refuses the melodrama of replacement: acknowledging the artistry in science doesn’t require “the abandonment…of all present art.” Instead, it accelerates a change already underway. That phrase “transformation…that has already begun” lands as a historical diagnosis: modern art, from abstraction to design to cinema, has been absorbing industrial materials, scientific ways of seeing, and new technologies for decades. The future, he implies, isn’t art versus science but art remade by scientific consciousness.
Context matters. Bernal was a crystallographer and a left-leaning public intellectual writing in a century of radar, atomic power, mass production, and state-funded research. In that world, “pure science” is never purely pure; it reorganizes society. His subtext: if science is going to reshape reality at scale, culture can’t afford to treat it as culturally illiterate. Art’s job is not to retreat, but to metabolize the new ways of knowing and, in doing so, complete the shift from ornament to instrument.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List
