"The usual approach of science of constructing a mathematical model cannot answer the questions of why there should be a universe for the model to describe. Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?"

In this thought-provoking quote, Stephen Hawking discuss the limitations of clinical questions, especially when it concerns fundamental existential questions. The "usual approach of science" refers to the empirical and mathematical methodologies that researchers use to comprehend and predict phenomena within deep space. Hawking acknowledges that while science is tremendously powerful in establishing models that explain the mechanics of the universe-- such as the laws of physics, cosmology theories, and quantum mechanics-- it disappoints addressing much deeper esoteric questions.

Hawking's pondering over "why there ought to be a universe for the model to describe" points to the philosophical distinction in between the 'how' and the 'why' concerns. Science excels at offering answers to 'how' concerns-- how galaxies form, how gravity works-- however struggles with 'why' concerns-- why deep space exists in the first location. These 'why' concerns explore the world of function and meaning, areas traditionally checked out by approach and faith.

His inquiry, "Why does deep space go to all the trouble of existing?" obstacles us to think about the nature of presence itself. It indicates a sense of marvel and potentially even absurdity about the fact that the universe exists versus frustrating chances, as modern theories like the Anthropic Principle recommend. This self-questioning hints at an existential, almost poetic view of the universe's existence-- a marvel that defies simple clinical description.

In essence, Hawking reminds us that while scientific models are invaluable tools for understanding and controling the real world, they are not equipped to address every concern human curiosity can position. The quote invites a synthesis of clinical insight with philosophical inquiry, prompting us to explore beyond mathematics and physics to look for understanding in areas where these disciplines intersect with existential approach. It highlights that the quest for knowledge is not just about looking for answers but likewise about asking profound questions that challenge the extremely basis of our understanding of presence.