"There are a tremendous amount of environmental issues that are on the table"
About this Quote
Rendell’s remark frames environmental policy as a crowded agenda rather than a single crusade. Saying issues are “on the table” puts the emphasis on governance: proposals, tradeoffs, and negotiations in real time. It conveys both scale and immediacy. The problems are numerous, they compete for attention and money, and they demand choices about sequencing and priority.
As mayor of Philadelphia and later governor of Pennsylvania, Ed Rendell worked at the intersection of economy, infrastructure, and environment. His state inherited coal’s legacy of acid mine drainage and abandoned lands even as it confronted stormwater, aging water systems, and air pollution. Then came the Marcellus Shale boom, with jobs and revenues on one side and fears over methane, water contamination, and fragmentation of landscapes on the other. Rendell backed measures like the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards, Act 129’s efficiency requirements, and the Growing Greener II bond, while also advocating for natural gas development with stricter oversight. That blend of promotion and constraint is the political reality contained in the line: many issues, many constituencies, limited dollars, and constant bargaining.
The sentence also pushes against a tendency to treat “the environment” as a single outcome. Climate change intersects with land use, transportation, public health, and jobs; Chesapeake Bay cleanup ties to farm practices and municipal stormwater; brownfield redevelopment overlaps with housing and equity. A table full of issues implies a portfolio approach, not siloed fixes. It calls for criteria to triage what to do first: risk reduction, justice for communities bearing cumulative harms, feasibility, and long-term return on investment.
The understated urgency suggests accountability. Putting items on the table is not enough; they must move off the table into funded plans with timelines. Rendell’s line, rooted in pragmatic statehouse experience, is a reminder that environmental progress depends less on grand declarations than on managing a crowded docket with discipline and coalition-building.
As mayor of Philadelphia and later governor of Pennsylvania, Ed Rendell worked at the intersection of economy, infrastructure, and environment. His state inherited coal’s legacy of acid mine drainage and abandoned lands even as it confronted stormwater, aging water systems, and air pollution. Then came the Marcellus Shale boom, with jobs and revenues on one side and fears over methane, water contamination, and fragmentation of landscapes on the other. Rendell backed measures like the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards, Act 129’s efficiency requirements, and the Growing Greener II bond, while also advocating for natural gas development with stricter oversight. That blend of promotion and constraint is the political reality contained in the line: many issues, many constituencies, limited dollars, and constant bargaining.
The sentence also pushes against a tendency to treat “the environment” as a single outcome. Climate change intersects with land use, transportation, public health, and jobs; Chesapeake Bay cleanup ties to farm practices and municipal stormwater; brownfield redevelopment overlaps with housing and equity. A table full of issues implies a portfolio approach, not siloed fixes. It calls for criteria to triage what to do first: risk reduction, justice for communities bearing cumulative harms, feasibility, and long-term return on investment.
The understated urgency suggests accountability. Putting items on the table is not enough; they must move off the table into funded plans with timelines. Rendell’s line, rooted in pragmatic statehouse experience, is a reminder that environmental progress depends less on grand declarations than on managing a crowded docket with discipline and coalition-building.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|
More Quotes by Ed
Add to List
