"To force a man to pay for the violation of his own liberty is indeed an addition of insult to injury"

Benjamin Tucker, a prominent 19th-century American anarchist and socialist, was a staunch supporter for private liberty and free-market anarchism. His quote, "To force a man to pay for the violation of his own liberty is indeed an addition of insult to injury", succinctly encapsulates his philosophical stance versus coercive systems of government and the imposition of state control over the person.

The expression "to require a guy to pay" recommends compulsion and absence of permission, which are antithetical to Tucker's belief in voluntary exchange and shared contract as the foundations of a just society. In this context, payment can be interpreted both monetarily, such as taxes or fines, and metaphorically, representing any form of sacrifice or problem positioned upon a private by the state. Tucker argues that it is ethically wrong to require compensation from somebody for an act that undermines their freedom.

The "offense of his own liberty" describes the myriad ways in which state power can overreach, suppressing personal liberties through legislation, policy, or force. Tucker saw the state as inherently overbearing, believing it infringed upon natural rights by determining habits, controlling economic interactions, and interfering in private affairs. This invasion becomes even more egregious when the individual must bear the cost of such oppression.

By stating "an addition of insult to injury", Tucker highlights the intensified injustice dealt with by people subjected to state browbeating. Not only is their liberty jeopardized, but they are likewise forced to fund the very mechanisms of their oppression. This adds a layer of indignity to the preliminary damage, intensifying the moral outrage.

In essence, the quote highlights Tucker's view that real justice and liberty emerge only in the absence of coercive authority, where people are totally free to handle their own affairs without imposition or economic exploitation by the state. His message remains a powerful tip of the importance of protecting personal flexibilities against external advancements.