"We could live at the present day without a Plato, but a double number of Newtons is required to discover the secrets of nature, and to bring life into harmony with the laws of nature"
About this Quote
Mendeleev lands a provocation that sounds like swagger but reads like a diagnosis: modernity can spare a philosopher, yet it cannot get enough scientists. The first clause is calculated heresy. Plato stands in for the whole prestige economy of high thought, the kind that crowns civilizations after the hard work is done. By casually suggesting we could do without him, Mendeleev isn’t dismissing ideas; he’s demoting a particular kind of intellectual authority at a moment when labs, not academies, were becoming the engines of destiny.
The second half tightens the screw. “A double number of Newtons” is intentionally absurd: you can’t mass-produce a Newton. That exaggeration signals urgency. Industrial society is expanding faster than comprehension; the “secrets of nature” aren’t aesthetic curiosities but actionable levers - electricity, chemistry, machinery - that can reorder economies and warfare. If nature has laws, then politics and morals start looking like downstream effects, and Mendeleev wants “life” - meaning everyday human systems, not just scientific theory - to stop freelancing against physics and chemistry.
Context matters. This is a 19th-century scientist watching nations remake themselves through applied knowledge, while Russia strains between tradition and modernization. The subtext is technocratic: progress isn’t a sermon, it’s an engineering problem. Harmony is not inner peace; it’s alignment, like a mechanism that either fits the constraints of reality or breaks. In that framing, philosophy without predictive power is a luxury, while science becomes a public necessity.
The second half tightens the screw. “A double number of Newtons” is intentionally absurd: you can’t mass-produce a Newton. That exaggeration signals urgency. Industrial society is expanding faster than comprehension; the “secrets of nature” aren’t aesthetic curiosities but actionable levers - electricity, chemistry, machinery - that can reorder economies and warfare. If nature has laws, then politics and morals start looking like downstream effects, and Mendeleev wants “life” - meaning everyday human systems, not just scientific theory - to stop freelancing against physics and chemistry.
Context matters. This is a 19th-century scientist watching nations remake themselves through applied knowledge, while Russia strains between tradition and modernization. The subtext is technocratic: progress isn’t a sermon, it’s an engineering problem. Harmony is not inner peace; it’s alignment, like a mechanism that either fits the constraints of reality or breaks. In that framing, philosophy without predictive power is a luxury, while science becomes a public necessity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Dmitri
Add to List



