"We have indeed at the moment little cause for pride: as a profession we have made a mess of things"
About this Quote
Hayek was speaking to his fellow economists, not the public, when he admitted that they had little cause for pride and had made a mess of things. The setting matters: his 1974 Nobel lecture, delivered amid stagflation and the unraveling of confident postwar macroeconomic management. He argued that economists had succumbed to what he called the pretence of knowledge, borrowing the techniques and aura of precision from the natural sciences to justify policies that presumed far more control over a complex economy than anyone could possess.
The mess was not only theoretical error. It was the practical harm of policies guided by oversimplified aggregates and seductive curves, promising fine-tuning of output and employment while eroding the informational role of prices and the discipline of monetary stability. Attempts to exploit a stable tradeoff between inflation and unemployment helped unleash both. Hayek pressed the point that economies are complex orders built on dispersed knowledge, and that interventions based on coarse measures and short-run targets often produce long-run distortions and unintended consequences.
His call was for epistemic humility and institutional thinking. Good economics, he argued, does not pretend to predict and manipulate the whole, but studies the rules and frameworks that allow individuals, each with fragmentary knowledge, to coordinate through markets. That implies a preference for general rules over discretionary technocratic steering, for stable money and clear property rights over ad hoc stimulus, and for explanation of tradeoffs over promises of painless solutions.
The line also reads as a moral rebuke to expert hubris. Authority carries responsibility, and when a profession claims powers it does not have, it risks harming those who trust it. The lesson travels beyond the 1970s. Every generation faces the temptation to overpromise based on models that fit yesterday. Hayek’s admonition asks economists to trade pride for candor about limits, and to rebuild credibility by aligning method and policy with the complexity of the world they aim to improve.
The mess was not only theoretical error. It was the practical harm of policies guided by oversimplified aggregates and seductive curves, promising fine-tuning of output and employment while eroding the informational role of prices and the discipline of monetary stability. Attempts to exploit a stable tradeoff between inflation and unemployment helped unleash both. Hayek pressed the point that economies are complex orders built on dispersed knowledge, and that interventions based on coarse measures and short-run targets often produce long-run distortions and unintended consequences.
His call was for epistemic humility and institutional thinking. Good economics, he argued, does not pretend to predict and manipulate the whole, but studies the rules and frameworks that allow individuals, each with fragmentary knowledge, to coordinate through markets. That implies a preference for general rules over discretionary technocratic steering, for stable money and clear property rights over ad hoc stimulus, and for explanation of tradeoffs over promises of painless solutions.
The line also reads as a moral rebuke to expert hubris. Authority carries responsibility, and when a profession claims powers it does not have, it risks harming those who trust it. The lesson travels beyond the 1970s. Every generation faces the temptation to overpromise based on models that fit yesterday. Hayek’s admonition asks economists to trade pride for candor about limits, and to rebuild credibility by aligning method and policy with the complexity of the world they aim to improve.
Quote Details
| Topic | Failure |
|---|
More Quotes by Friedrich
Add to List
