"What practical conclusions may we now draw for our propaganda work among women? The task of this Party Congress must not be to issue detailed practical suggestions, but to draw up general directions for the proletarian women's movement"
About this Quote
Zetkin’s phrasing lands like a corrective to a certain kind of activist impatience: the craving for checklists, slogans, and quick “practical” fixes. She opens with the language of utility - “practical conclusions,” “propaganda work” - then immediately refuses the temptation to micromanage. That pivot is the point. In a movement that must mobilize at scale, she’s arguing that the most “practical” thing a party congress can do is not produce a how-to manual, but set the ideological rails: “general directions” that local organizers can adapt to real conditions.
The subtext is internal discipline. “Propaganda among women” is not framed as an auxiliary concern or charitable outreach; it’s a strategic front in class struggle, requiring coordination and an agreed line. Zetkin is also fencing off competing agendas inside the left: bourgeois feminism on one side, and party factions that treat women’s organizing as optional on the other. By naming a “proletarian women’s movement,” she insists that women’s emancipation, in her view, is inseparable from proletarian politics - not a parallel project, not a sentimental add-on.
Historically, this sits in the early 20th-century socialist world where parties were becoming mass institutions, and “women’s work” often meant being relegated to the margins. Zetkin’s rhetorical move is to upgrade it: not by drowning it in directives from above, but by making it a principled mandate from the center. The irony is that she uses the bureaucratic setting of a congress to argue against bureaucratic overreach.
The subtext is internal discipline. “Propaganda among women” is not framed as an auxiliary concern or charitable outreach; it’s a strategic front in class struggle, requiring coordination and an agreed line. Zetkin is also fencing off competing agendas inside the left: bourgeois feminism on one side, and party factions that treat women’s organizing as optional on the other. By naming a “proletarian women’s movement,” she insists that women’s emancipation, in her view, is inseparable from proletarian politics - not a parallel project, not a sentimental add-on.
Historically, this sits in the early 20th-century socialist world where parties were becoming mass institutions, and “women’s work” often meant being relegated to the margins. Zetkin’s rhetorical move is to upgrade it: not by drowning it in directives from above, but by making it a principled mandate from the center. The irony is that she uses the bureaucratic setting of a congress to argue against bureaucratic overreach.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Clara
Add to List

