"When the state or federal government control the education of all of our children, they have the dangerous and illegitimate monopoly to control and influence the thought process of our citizens"
About this Quote
A real fear is doing the heavy lifting here: not just that government-run schools might teach the “wrong” facts, but that they might manufacture the kinds of minds that never challenge power. Badnarik frames education as the upstream source of citizenship itself, then treats control over that source as inherently suspect. It’s classic libertarian rhetoric: the state isn’t merely inefficient or bureaucratic; it’s structurally tempted to turn public goods into tools of compliance.
Notice the word choices. “Control” appears twice, as if to insist that any administrative role is already coercion. “All of our children” widens the stakes from policy to parental custody and moral panic. The keystone is “dangerous and illegitimate monopoly,” a phrase that borrows the language of antitrust and markets to moralize the issue: monopolies aren’t just bad outcomes, they’re violations of freedom. By calling it “illegitimate,” he sidesteps debates about democratic accountability and goes straight to delegitimization, implying that even a voter-backed system can be fundamentally wrong.
The subtext is less about curriculum details and more about institutional trust. If you believe the state’s incentives are self-preserving, then schools become a soft-power arm of government, producing consent rather than knowledge. The argument also quietly collapses “public education” into “government indoctrination,” a move that gains urgency by ignoring pluralism inside school systems: local boards, messy politics, teachers with their own views, parents pushing back.
Context matters: Badnarik’s political lane (Libertarian Party figure in the post-9/11 era) was defined by suspicion of centralized authority. This line isn’t aiming for compromise; it’s a warning label meant to make public schooling feel like a constitutional risk.
Notice the word choices. “Control” appears twice, as if to insist that any administrative role is already coercion. “All of our children” widens the stakes from policy to parental custody and moral panic. The keystone is “dangerous and illegitimate monopoly,” a phrase that borrows the language of antitrust and markets to moralize the issue: monopolies aren’t just bad outcomes, they’re violations of freedom. By calling it “illegitimate,” he sidesteps debates about democratic accountability and goes straight to delegitimization, implying that even a voter-backed system can be fundamentally wrong.
The subtext is less about curriculum details and more about institutional trust. If you believe the state’s incentives are self-preserving, then schools become a soft-power arm of government, producing consent rather than knowledge. The argument also quietly collapses “public education” into “government indoctrination,” a move that gains urgency by ignoring pluralism inside school systems: local boards, messy politics, teachers with their own views, parents pushing back.
Context matters: Badnarik’s political lane (Libertarian Party figure in the post-9/11 era) was defined by suspicion of centralized authority. This line isn’t aiming for compromise; it’s a warning label meant to make public schooling feel like a constitutional risk.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List
