"A good marriage is one which allows for change and growth in the individuals and in the way they express their love"
About this Quote
Pearl S. Buck smuggles a quiet radicalism into what could sound like domestic reassurance. A "good marriage", in her framing, is not a locked contract or a fixed personality test with rings. Its success metric is motion: change, growth, and the evolving language of love. That last clause matters most. She does not just make room for people to become different; she insists the relationship must develop new ways to translate that difference into care.
Buck came of age between eras, writing across cultures and watching how institutions - family, religion, nation - can turn virtue into rigidity. The line reads like a rebuttal to the marriage-as-stability ideal, the one that treats adulthood as a final form and spouses as custodians of each other's permanence. Her syntax is almost legalistic ("allows for"), as if she's rewriting the terms: the point isn't romance as a constant feeling, but a structure flexible enough to survive the fact that people aren't constant.
The subtext is a critique of possessiveness dressed up as devotion. Many marriages fail not because love evaporates, but because one partner's growth is experienced as betrayal, a new dialect interpreted as disloyalty. Buck offers a different ethic: love as adaptive practice, not a vow to remain intelligible forever.
It's also an author's insight. Novelists know characters either evolve or become caricatures. Buck applies that narrative rule to intimacy: a marriage that forbids revision traps two protagonists in the same scene until resentment becomes the only plot left.
Buck came of age between eras, writing across cultures and watching how institutions - family, religion, nation - can turn virtue into rigidity. The line reads like a rebuttal to the marriage-as-stability ideal, the one that treats adulthood as a final form and spouses as custodians of each other's permanence. Her syntax is almost legalistic ("allows for"), as if she's rewriting the terms: the point isn't romance as a constant feeling, but a structure flexible enough to survive the fact that people aren't constant.
The subtext is a critique of possessiveness dressed up as devotion. Many marriages fail not because love evaporates, but because one partner's growth is experienced as betrayal, a new dialect interpreted as disloyalty. Buck offers a different ethic: love as adaptive practice, not a vow to remain intelligible forever.
It's also an author's insight. Novelists know characters either evolve or become caricatures. Buck applies that narrative rule to intimacy: a marriage that forbids revision traps two protagonists in the same scene until resentment becomes the only plot left.
Quote Details
| Topic | Marriage |
|---|
More Quotes by Pearl
Add to List




