"A great memory does not make a mind, any more than a dictionary is a piece of literature"
About this Quote
Newman draws a sharp line between possessing information and possessing understanding. Memory can store facts, dates, names, and definitions, but the mind earns its name when it interprets, connects, and judges. A dictionary contains all the words an author might use, yet without the shaping impulse of imagination and purpose it remains inert. In the same way, a head crammed with data is not the same as an intellect alive to meaning, relation, and truth.
The remark comes from The Idea of a University, where Newman defends liberal education against a narrow, utilitarian model. He argues that universities should cultivate what he calls a philosophical habit: the power to see things as a whole, to discern first principles, to weigh evidence, to balance claims, and to hold a steady view amid complexity. Rote learning, prized by exam systems then as now, can be impressive, but it cannot by itself form judgment. Without training in reasoning and taste, facts sit side by side like words in an index, unshaped by context and incapable of insight.
By invoking literature, Newman underscores the creative and ethical dimensions of knowledge. Literature is not just correct grammar and a full vocabulary; it is style, coherence, and vision. Likewise, a mind is not a ledger; it is an active power that orders experience, critiques assumptions, imagines alternatives, and seeks the good as well as the true.
The claim resonates in an age of unlimited information. Search engines and databases can retrieve more than any human could remember, but they cannot guarantee the intellectual virtues that guide inquiry. Education worthy of the name aims beyond recall to understanding, beyond information to wisdom. To have a mind, on Newmans terms, is to make knowledge intelligible and humane, to move from the scattered entries of the dictionary to the living architecture of literature.
The remark comes from The Idea of a University, where Newman defends liberal education against a narrow, utilitarian model. He argues that universities should cultivate what he calls a philosophical habit: the power to see things as a whole, to discern first principles, to weigh evidence, to balance claims, and to hold a steady view amid complexity. Rote learning, prized by exam systems then as now, can be impressive, but it cannot by itself form judgment. Without training in reasoning and taste, facts sit side by side like words in an index, unshaped by context and incapable of insight.
By invoking literature, Newman underscores the creative and ethical dimensions of knowledge. Literature is not just correct grammar and a full vocabulary; it is style, coherence, and vision. Likewise, a mind is not a ledger; it is an active power that orders experience, critiques assumptions, imagines alternatives, and seeks the good as well as the true.
The claim resonates in an age of unlimited information. Search engines and databases can retrieve more than any human could remember, but they cannot guarantee the intellectual virtues that guide inquiry. Education worthy of the name aims beyond recall to understanding, beyond information to wisdom. To have a mind, on Newmans terms, is to make knowledge intelligible and humane, to move from the scattered entries of the dictionary to the living architecture of literature.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List
