"Books, I don't know what you see in them. I can understand a person reading them, but I can't for the life of me see why people have to write them"
About this Quote
A mischievous reversal animates the line: most cultural handwringing asks why people read; here the question becomes why anyone insists on writing. The humor lies in the disproportion between the delicate pleasure of reading and the laborious, presumptive act of authorship. Reading is a private enrichment; writing proclaims, however modestly, that ones thoughts warrant other peoples time. Peter Ustinov pokes at the vanity and compulsion of creators while saluting the effortless grace that reading can feel like from the armchair.
The irony is richer because Ustinov was himself a prolific novelist, playwright, and essayist. The joke doubles as self-mockery, the seasoned practitioners shrug at their own trade. He knew the grind behind a finished book: drafts, cuts, doubt, and the public judgment that follows. From that vantage, the readers role looks enviably simple, and the writers drive faintly absurd. Yet the choice of words matters: people who have to write them. He hints at an interior necessity that many artists confess, a pressure to make shape out of experience, to leave a record, to converse with the not-yet-met. The line feigns incomprehension to underline how mysterious that compulsion can seem, even to those who feel it.
It also deflates the pieties of literary culture. Without writers there are no books, yet the quip tells us not to exalt authors as oracles. Books may nourish without our needing to revere the hand that made them. That is typical Ustinov: urbane, aphoristic, allergic to pomposity. The joke lands because it is both false and true: false because writing is indispensable to the existence of books; true because, viewed from the outside, the urge to write can look quixotic. The laugh clears the air, leaving gratitude for readers joys and a reminder to writers to keep their vanity in check and their sense of humor alive.
The irony is richer because Ustinov was himself a prolific novelist, playwright, and essayist. The joke doubles as self-mockery, the seasoned practitioners shrug at their own trade. He knew the grind behind a finished book: drafts, cuts, doubt, and the public judgment that follows. From that vantage, the readers role looks enviably simple, and the writers drive faintly absurd. Yet the choice of words matters: people who have to write them. He hints at an interior necessity that many artists confess, a pressure to make shape out of experience, to leave a record, to converse with the not-yet-met. The line feigns incomprehension to underline how mysterious that compulsion can seem, even to those who feel it.
It also deflates the pieties of literary culture. Without writers there are no books, yet the quip tells us not to exalt authors as oracles. Books may nourish without our needing to revere the hand that made them. That is typical Ustinov: urbane, aphoristic, allergic to pomposity. The joke lands because it is both false and true: false because writing is indispensable to the existence of books; true because, viewed from the outside, the urge to write can look quixotic. The laugh clears the air, leaving gratitude for readers joys and a reminder to writers to keep their vanity in check and their sense of humor alive.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sarcastic |
|---|
More Quotes by Peter
Add to List


