"Every good cause is worth some inefficiency"

The quote "Every good cause deserves some inefficiency" by Paul Samuelson speaks to the concept that the pursuit of noble and simply goals typically requires a tolerance for, and even an acceptance of, particular inefficiencies in their execution. This perspective can be translated through different lenses-- financial, social, and moral.

From a financial perspective, Samuelson, a renowned economist himself, mean the inherent friction within systems aimed at accomplishing morally desirable results. In economics, effectiveness is often heralded as a vital objective, with systems created to make the most of outputs while lessening inputs. However, when it pertains to dealing with issues like social justice, ecological sustainability, or public health, rigid adherence to effectiveness may ignore the wider effects and benefits of aiming towards these altruistic goals. In such cases, what is deemed ineffective in the short-term might in truth be vital for the long-term improvement of society.

On a social level, the quote encourages empathy and a wider understanding of communal goals that go beyond personal or instant gain. Social causes typically require grassroots movements, advocacy, education, and policy changes-- all of which may be viewed as troublesome or sluggish in a result-oriented framework. These efforts might initially seem ineffective when measured by conventional metrics, yet they are crucial for developing meaningful, long lasting change.

Morally, the quote highlights the ethical crucial to focus on "good causes", regardless of the challenges and detours come across along the method. Sacrificing a degree of performance is in some cases required to pursue righteousness, compassion, and the higher good. It suggests that the course to accomplishing a simply cause might not always be the most direct or least resource-intensive, but it stays worthwhile because of the ultimate value of the result.

In essence, Samuelson's statement is a call to assess the worth of a cause not merely in terms of performance however rather in its capability to advance considerable moral and social goals. It advocates for a well balanced view where the intrinsic messiness and intricacies of pushing for modification are accepted as part of the procedure in the pursuit of enhancing the human condition.