"I must confess that my imagination refuses to see any sort of submarine doing anything but suffocating its crew and floundering at sea"
About this Quote
Wells’s “must confess” is a sly throat-clear before he drops the blade: the future, he’s implying, isn’t obliged to cooperate with the fantasies of engineers or the chest-thumping of naval strategists. The line works because it weaponizes imagination against technology. Instead of celebrating invention, Wells stages his mind as a stubborn witness, refusing to hallucinate competence where he sees only catastrophe. “Refuses to see” isn’t mere opinion; it’s a performance of skepticism, a refusal to grant legitimacy to a new machine simply because it exists.
The specific imagery is deliberately claustrophobic. A submarine, in his telling, is not a sleek predator but a sealed coffin: “suffocating its crew” turns progress into self-harm. “Floundering at sea” lands the second punch, stripping away the romance of mastery and replacing it with helplessness. This is less about nautical mechanics than about the Victorian and early modern faith that technological novelty equals human control.
Context matters: Wells wrote while industrial modernity was accelerating faster than its moral vocabulary. Submarines were emerging from the realm of speculative tinkering into plausible warfare, and the idea of invisible killing beneath the surface carried an ethical stench. His skepticism isn’t just practical; it’s political. By casting the submarine as inherently incompetent and lethal to its own operators, Wells hints that certain innovations arrive already stained - not because they might fail, but because their success would normalize a colder, more dehumanized kind of conflict.
The specific imagery is deliberately claustrophobic. A submarine, in his telling, is not a sleek predator but a sealed coffin: “suffocating its crew” turns progress into self-harm. “Floundering at sea” lands the second punch, stripping away the romance of mastery and replacing it with helplessness. This is less about nautical mechanics than about the Victorian and early modern faith that technological novelty equals human control.
Context matters: Wells wrote while industrial modernity was accelerating faster than its moral vocabulary. Submarines were emerging from the realm of speculative tinkering into plausible warfare, and the idea of invisible killing beneath the surface carried an ethical stench. His skepticism isn’t just practical; it’s political. By casting the submarine as inherently incompetent and lethal to its own operators, Wells hints that certain innovations arrive already stained - not because they might fail, but because their success would normalize a colder, more dehumanized kind of conflict.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Wells
Add to List







