"In other words, if a teacher only teaches in one way, then they conclude that the kids who can't learn well that way don't have the ability, when, in fact, it may be that the way the teacher's teaching is not a particularly good match to the way those kids learn"
About this Quote
Sternberg is politely detonating one of education’s most durable delusions: that a classroom’s “average” method is neutral, and whoever falls behind has revealed a personal deficit. The sentence is engineered to expose a causal sleight of hand. “In other words” signals he’s translating an unspoken logic teachers (and systems) rarely admit: one pedagogy becomes the yardstick, then the yardstick becomes destiny. When students don’t measure up, the institution labels the child, not the tool.
The subtext is accountability without melodrama. Sternberg doesn’t accuse teachers of cruelty; he describes a cognitive habit: mistaking convenience for truth. “Only teaches in one way” isn’t just a pedagogical critique, it’s a power critique. Standardization lets adults keep control and keep moving. Declaring certain kids “unable” protects the teacher’s self-concept, justifies tracking, and makes inequality look like nature rather than design.
Context matters here: Sternberg’s work on intelligence and “successful intelligence” pushed against the idea that IQ-style measures capture the full range of human competence. This quote sits in that tradition, arguing that performance is relational - an interaction between minds and environments - not a fixed essence. The phrasing “not a particularly good match” is strategic restraint. It avoids the kumbaya misread of “everyone learns differently” and lands somewhere sharper: instruction is a choice, and every choice has casualties. By reframing mismatch as the culprit, Sternberg doesn’t just defend students; he challenges the system’s favorite alibi.
The subtext is accountability without melodrama. Sternberg doesn’t accuse teachers of cruelty; he describes a cognitive habit: mistaking convenience for truth. “Only teaches in one way” isn’t just a pedagogical critique, it’s a power critique. Standardization lets adults keep control and keep moving. Declaring certain kids “unable” protects the teacher’s self-concept, justifies tracking, and makes inequality look like nature rather than design.
Context matters here: Sternberg’s work on intelligence and “successful intelligence” pushed against the idea that IQ-style measures capture the full range of human competence. This quote sits in that tradition, arguing that performance is relational - an interaction between minds and environments - not a fixed essence. The phrasing “not a particularly good match” is strategic restraint. It avoids the kumbaya misread of “everyone learns differently” and lands somewhere sharper: instruction is a choice, and every choice has casualties. By reframing mismatch as the culprit, Sternberg doesn’t just defend students; he challenges the system’s favorite alibi.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List
