"Retaliation is related to nature and instinct, not to law. Law, by definition, cannot obey the same rules as nature"
About this Quote
Camus cuts straight through a temptation that democracies keep dressing up as “justice”: the urge to hit back. By yoking retaliation to “nature and instinct,” he’s not praising the primal; he’s demoting it. Retaliation belongs to the animal repertoire - immediate, symmetrical, emotionally satisfying. Law, he insists, is an invention precisely because instinct isn’t good enough. If law “obeys the same rules as nature,” it stops being a civilizing structure and becomes a licensed version of the very violence it claims to restrain.
The sentence works because it’s a trap for the reader’s moral complacency. Most people want the state to be both impartial referee and righteous avenger. Camus denies that double role. “By definition” is doing heavy lifting: law isn’t merely a set of procedures; it’s a promise to interrupt the reflex. When the state retaliates, it doesn’t just punish a person, it models a worldview - that force can be legitimized by mirroring force. That’s how punishment slides into spectacle, and how institutions inherit the grudges of the crowd.
Context matters: Camus wrote in the shadow of WWII, the Resistance, purges, and the fresh moral wounds of collaboration and reprisal. He was also a public opponent of the death penalty. You can hear that debate inside this line: execution as retaliation dressed in robes. The subtext is bleakly practical: societies don’t fall apart because individuals seek revenge; they fall apart when governments do, and call it law.
The sentence works because it’s a trap for the reader’s moral complacency. Most people want the state to be both impartial referee and righteous avenger. Camus denies that double role. “By definition” is doing heavy lifting: law isn’t merely a set of procedures; it’s a promise to interrupt the reflex. When the state retaliates, it doesn’t just punish a person, it models a worldview - that force can be legitimized by mirroring force. That’s how punishment slides into spectacle, and how institutions inherit the grudges of the crowd.
Context matters: Camus wrote in the shadow of WWII, the Resistance, purges, and the fresh moral wounds of collaboration and reprisal. He was also a public opponent of the death penalty. You can hear that debate inside this line: execution as retaliation dressed in robes. The subtext is bleakly practical: societies don’t fall apart because individuals seek revenge; they fall apart when governments do, and call it law.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Albert
Add to List








