"Since the generality of persons act from impulse, much more than from principle, men are neither so good nor so bad as we are apt to think them"
About this Quote
Hare slips a quiet blade into moral certainty: most people, he argues, aren’t steady heroes or consistent villains because they’re not primarily guided by “principle” at all. They’re guided by impulse - mood, appetite, fear, vanity, fatigue, the social weather of a room. It’s a demotion of character as Victorian culture liked to flatter it: less granite, more sand. The line works because it isn’t an uplifting humanist shrug or a misanthropic sneer. It’s a recalibration. If action is largely impulsive, then our moral judgments are often overconfident readings of underexamined moments.
The subtext is aimed at two popular fantasies at once: the fantasy of the pure-hearted person who will reliably do the right thing, and the fantasy of the irredeemable scoundrel whose every move confirms our condemnation. Hare’s “neither so good nor so bad” is a warning against narrative thinking - the habit of turning people into stable types so the world feels legible. Impulse is messier and, importantly, situational. It suggests that context is a co-author of behavior, which makes moral accounting harder but also more honest.
As a late-19th-century writer steeped in observation and biography, Hare is also defending a certain charitable realism: judge less from a single act, praise less from a single gesture, and design your expectations around human inconsistency. The consequence isn’t moral relativism; it’s moral humility with better predictive power.
The subtext is aimed at two popular fantasies at once: the fantasy of the pure-hearted person who will reliably do the right thing, and the fantasy of the irredeemable scoundrel whose every move confirms our condemnation. Hare’s “neither so good nor so bad” is a warning against narrative thinking - the habit of turning people into stable types so the world feels legible. Impulse is messier and, importantly, situational. It suggests that context is a co-author of behavior, which makes moral accounting harder but also more honest.
As a late-19th-century writer steeped in observation and biography, Hare is also defending a certain charitable realism: judge less from a single act, praise less from a single gesture, and design your expectations around human inconsistency. The consequence isn’t moral relativism; it’s moral humility with better predictive power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Augustus
Add to List













