"There is a point at which even justice does injury"

Sophocles, the ancient Greek tragedian, presents a profound and paradoxical statement through these chilling words, bringing our attention to the delicate balance of fairness, punishment, and mercy. The inherent contradiction in his words questions the sanctity of justice as the ultimate good. A deciphering of his sentiment showcases that pivotal moments exist where absolute justice administered without restraint can, in effect, transform into a form of harm.

In an ideal society, justice is perceived to bring resolution, peace, and fairness. Designed to right the wrong, it paves a way towards a more balanced societal order. However, Sophocles' viewpoint challenges the infallibility of such a system where justice might lead to injury. To unravel this complex notion, it requires a deep understanding of the punitive element of justice. Although punishment is a crucial part of justice, the intensity of punishment often depends on the severity of the crime. This dimension introduces a perception of justice that proposes varying degrees of punishment commensurate to the grievance of the crime.

However, here lies a broader contemplation. Justice can be more than just retribution; it can embody rehabilitation and forgiveness. Hence, when justice turns into a mere instrument for punishment and revenge, it potentially escalates the cycle of harm, stimulating a culture of vicious retribution. History has repeatedly demonstrated this tormenting cycle of harm.

Delving into the philosophical depths of Sophocles’ thought encapsulates a plea for mercy, forgiveness, and restoration over strict punitive justice. It portrays justice as a nuanced, many-faced entity that doesn’t solely rely on penalization. It underscores the need for adapting a constructive approach to punishment that incorporates empathy alongside retribution.

Therefore, Sophocles’ chilling words mirror this dire reality, emphasizing the necessity of balance. Justice without mercy or understanding can injure the society it aims to protect, perpetuating harm and resentment. Consequently, justice should not only focus on righting the wrong but engage a broader perspective, including rehabilitation and reconciliation. Hence, it's fundamental to recognize its dual nature and navigate the fine line between fairness and injury.