"To prefer evil to good is not in human nature; and when a man is compelled to choose one of two evils, no one will choose the greater when he might have the less"

Plato is exploring the fundamental nature of human morality and decision-making. He argues that humans are not inherently inclined to pursue evil or harm but are rather disposed toward what they perceive as good. When confronted with choices, particularly between two negative options, individuals instinctively avoid greater harm and select the lesser evil. This suggests that people, by nature, gravitate toward minimizing wrongdoing and its consequences, even when faced with morally compromising situations.

The passage assumes that moral choices are often a matter of degree rather than absolute categories. When ideal options are unavailable and only undesirable alternatives remain, people still seek to act in the least damaging way possible. This insight aligns with the broader philosophical idea that even under duress, individuals aim to uphold justice or virtue to the extent that circumstances allow. People do not willingly embrace serious wrongdoing; when faced with necessity, they inevitably seek to mitigate negative outcomes, preferring the path that aligns more closely with their conscience and sense of goodness.

Plato’s assertion challenges the notion that humans are willfully malicious or destructive. Instead, he presents a view of human nature grounded in reason and ethical discernment. Harmful actions, when they occur, are often the result of ignorance or compulsion rather than genuine preference for evil. When a person acts wrongly, it is not because she values wrongdoing above all else, but rather because she sees it as the least objectionable course available or is unaware of a better option.

The extract also implies a call for empathy and understanding toward those who seem to make poor choices. By recognizing the constraints or limited options behind actions, there emerges an opportunity for compassion and a deeper grasp of the human condition. The recognition that all strive, within their limitations, to choose the less harmful path underlines the centrality of moral reasoning and the persistent pursuit of the good in human life.